These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21585705)
21. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France. Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pemetrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Mir O; Boudou-Rouquette P; Giroux J; Chapron J; Alexandre J; Gibault L; Ropert S; Coriat R; Durand JP; Burgel PR; Dusser D; Goldwasser F Lung Cancer; 2012 Jul; 77(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 22364783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Induction pemetrexed and cisplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab: a quality of life-oriented randomized phase III study in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (ERACLE). Galetta D; Pisconti S; Cinieri S; Pappagallo GL; Gebbia V; Borsellino N; Maiello E; Rinaldi A; Montrone M; Rizzo P; Marzano N; Sasso N; Febbraro A; Colucci G Clin Lung Cancer; 2011 Nov; 12(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 21831718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Phase II study of carboplatin and pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer: Kyoto Thoracic Oncology Research Group Trial 0902. Kim YH; Hirabayashi M; Togashi Y; Hirano K; Tomii K; Masago K; Kaneda T; Yoshimatsu H; Otsuka K; Mio T; Tomioka H; Suzuki Y; Mishima M Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 70(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 22752216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness of first-line induction and maintenance treatment sequences in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the U.S. Kumar G; Woods B; Hess LM; Treat J; Boye ME; Bryden P; Winfree KB Lung Cancer; 2015 Sep; 89(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 26122345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Cohn DE; Kim KH; Resnick KE; O'Malley DM; Straughn JM J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21383297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Simulation and comparison of progression-free survival among patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving sequential therapy. Walzer S; Chouaid C; Lister J; Gultyaev D; Vergnenegre A; de Marinis F; Meng J; de Castro Carpeno J; Crott R; Kleman M; Ngoh C Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2015 Jan; 15(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 25248391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience. Malhotra B; Evans T; Weiss J; Eaby B; Stonehouse-Lee S; Sherry V; Langer CJ Clin Lung Cancer; 2010 May; 11(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 20439196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Economic analysis of NCIC CTG JBR.10: a randomized trial of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer--a report of the Working Group on Economic Analysis, and the Lung Disease Site Group, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Ng R; Hasan B; Mittmann N; Florescu M; Shepherd FA; Ding K; Butts CA; Cormier Y; Darling G; Goss GD; Inculet R; Seymour L; Winton TL; Evans WK; Leighl NB; ; ; J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jun; 25(16):2256-61. PubMed ID: 17538170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of bevacizumab- and pemetrexed-cisplatin treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Nuijten M; Heigener DF; Bischoff HG; Chouaid C; Vergnenègre A; de Castro Carpeño J; Aultman R; Walzer S; Siebert U Lung Cancer; 2010 Aug; 69 Suppl 1():S4-10. PubMed ID: 20727460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin as first line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain. González García J; Gutiérrez Nicolás F; Nazco Casariego GJ; Valcárcel Nazco C; Batista López JN; Oramas Rodríguez J Farm Hosp; 2017 Jan; 41(n01):3-13. PubMed ID: 28045649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative effectiveness of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy versus pemetrexed plus cisplatin treatment in East Asian non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients applying real-life outcomes. Chang GC; Ahn MJ; Wright E; Kim HT; Kim JH; Kang JH; Kim SW; Sherman S; Walzer S Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():34-40. PubMed ID: 21585706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Treatment rationale and study design for a randomized trial of pemetrexed/carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of nonsquamous histology. Zinner RG; Saxman SB; Peng G; Monberg MJ; Ortuzar WI Clin Lung Cancer; 2010 Sep; 11(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 20837462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A cross-market cost comparison of erlotinib versus pemetrexed for first-line maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Nuijten MJ; de Castro Carpeño J; Chouaid C; Vergnenègre A; Grossi F; Bischoff H; Heigener D; Walzer S Lung Cancer; 2012 Jun; 76(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 22153602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Raltitrexed plus cisplatin is cost-effective compared with pemetrexed plus cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Woods B; Paracha N; Scott DA; Thatcher N Lung Cancer; 2012 Feb; 75(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 21937141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost effectiveness analysis of afatinib versus pemetrexed-cisplatin for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer from the Singapore healthcare payer's perspective. Tan PT; Aziz MIA; Pearce F; Lim WT; Wu DB; Ng K BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):352. PubMed ID: 29587666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of patient outcomes according to histology among pemetrexed-treated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer in two phase II trials. Zinner RG; Novello S; Peng G; Herbst R; Obasaju C; Scagliotti G Clin Lung Cancer; 2010 Mar; 11(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 20199979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pharmacogenetic study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with second-line pemetrexed or pemetrexed-carboplatin. Tiseo M; Giovannetti E; Tibaldi C; Camerini A; Di Costanzo F; Barbieri F; Burgers JA; Vincent A; Peters GJ; Smit EF; Ardizzoni A Lung Cancer; 2012 Oct; 78(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22889494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment rationale and study design for the pointbreak study: a randomized, open-label phase III study of pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed/bevacizumab versus paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Patel JD; Bonomi P; Socinski MA; Govindan R; Hong S; Obasaju C; Pennella EJ; Girvan AC; Guba SC Clin Lung Cancer; 2009 Jul; 10(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19632943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]