These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21586946)

  • 1. Angular photogrammetric comparison of the soft-tissue facial profile of Kenyans and Chinese.
    Wamalwa P; Amisi SK; Wang Y; Chen S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21586946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue profile in 12-year-old southern Chinese.
    Leung CS; Yang Y; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lo J; McGrath C
    Head Face Med; 2014 Dec; 10():56. PubMed ID: 25540054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photogrammetric analysis of facial profile in Persian adults.
    Jamilian A; Darnahal A; Hamedi R; Kamali Z; Toopchi S
    Gen Dent; 2016; 64(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 26943089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 3-dimensional anthropometric evaluation of facial morphology among Chinese and Greek population.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Pan F; Zhou H; Zhang Q; Zacharopoulos GV
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):e353-8. PubMed ID: 23851867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balanced angular profile analysis.
    Rhee SC; Kang SR; Park HS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):535-44. PubMed ID: 15277828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Facial Proportions Between Beauty Pageant Contestants and Ordinary Young Women of Korean Ethnicity: A Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Analysis.
    Kim SC; Kim HB; Jeong WS; Koh KS; Huh CH; Kim HJ; Lee WS; Choi JW
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 42(3):748-758. PubMed ID: 29380023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability Study of Angular and Linear Measurements on Facial Morphology Analysis by Means of Stereophotogrammetry.
    Andrade LM; Rodrigues da Silva AMB; Magri LV; Rodrigues da Silva MAM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 28212123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The facial soft tissue profile of the southern Chinese: prosthodontic considerations.
    Chiu CS; Clark RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):839-50. PubMed ID: 1432812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sagittal photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profile between two different racial groups: a comparative study].
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Jun; 38(150):5-14. PubMed ID: 26934767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Cross-Sectional Study to Determine and Compare the Craniofacial Anthropometric Norms in a Selected Kenyan and Chinese Population.
    Sarna K; Sonigra KJ; Ngeow WC
    Plast Surg (Oakv); 2023 Feb; 31(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 36755821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.
    Yeung CY; McGrath CP; Wong RW; Hägg EU; Lo J; Yang Y
    Head Face Med; 2015 Aug; 11():26. PubMed ID: 26271276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women.
    Sim RS; Smith JD; Chan AS
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2000; 2(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 10925436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.