BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21590719)

  • 1. Relationship of donor variables and graft dimension on biomechanical performance of femoral ring allograft.
    Hart RA; Daniels AH; Bahney T; Tesar J; Sales JR; Bay B
    J Orthop Res; 2011 Dec; 29(12):1840-5. PubMed ID: 21590719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone mineral density and donor age are not predictive of femoral ring allograft bone mechanical strength.
    Krishnamoorthy B; Bay BK; Hart RA
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Oct; 32(10):1271-6. PubMed ID: 25041905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior cervical interbody constructs: effect of a repetitive compressive force on the endplate.
    Ordway NR; Rim BC; Tan R; Hickman R; Fayyazi AH
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 22002745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis of allograft bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process.
    Mroz TE; Lin EL; Summit MC; Bianchi JR; Keesling JE; Roberts M; Vangsness CT; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16413445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The need for structural allograft biomechanical guidelines.
    Kawaguchi S; Hart RA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2015 Feb; 23(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25624364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The need for structural allograft biomechanical guidelines.
    Kawaguchi S; Hart RA
    Instr Course Lect; 2015; 64():87-93. PubMed ID: 25745897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical effects of processing bulk allograft bone with negative-pressure washing.
    Tenholder MJ; Kneisl JS; Harrow ME; Peindl RD; Stanley KJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 Jun; 32(6):289-97. PubMed ID: 12834192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in tissue bank practices regarding donor and tissue screening of structural allograft bone.
    Jurgensmeier D; Hart R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):E702-7. PubMed ID: 20535046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femoral ring versus fibular strut allografts in anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis. A biomechanical analysis.
    Siff TE; Kamaric E; Noble PC; Esses SI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(7):659-65. PubMed ID: 10209794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk.
    Bouxsein ML; Szulc P; Munoz F; Thrall E; Sornay-Rendu E; Delmas PD
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Jun; 22(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 17352651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody lumbar spinal fusion.
    Chen D; Kummer FJ; Spivak JM
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Dec; 10(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 9438821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical strength of bone allografts subjected to chemical sterilization and other terminal processing methods.
    Mikhael MM; Huddleston PM; Zobitz ME; Chen Q; Zhao KD; An KN
    J Biomech; 2008 Sep; 41(13):2816-20. PubMed ID: 18760413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distractive force relative to initial graft compression in an in vivo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion model.
    Francke EI; Demetropoulos CK; Agabegi SS; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 20147873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women's Health Study.
    Petit MA; Beck TJ; Lin HM; Bentley C; Legro RS; Lloyd T
    Bone; 2004 Sep; 35(3):750-9. PubMed ID: 15336612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts.
    An HS; Lynch K; Toth J
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Apr; 8(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 7606120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A biomechanical study on different fixation of cortical bone plate allograft].
    Zhang R; Liao Y; Li B
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 21(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 17882869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk.
    Melton LJ; Riggs BL; Keaveny TM; Achenbach SJ; Hoffmann PF; Camp JJ; Rouleau PA; Bouxsein ML; Amin S; Atkinson EJ; Robb RA; Khosla S
    J Bone Miner Res; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1885-92. PubMed ID: 17680721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.