432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21590796)
1. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What can be learnt from an ecotoxicity database in the framework of the REACh regulation?
Henegar A; Mombelli E; Pandard P; Péry AR
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 21093016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ECETOC Florence workshop on risk assessment of endocrine substances, including the potency concept.
Fegert I
Toxicol Lett; 2013 Dec; 223(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 23558296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecotoxicity testing of chemicals with particular reference to pesticides.
Walker CH
Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Jul; 62(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 16671067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory ecotoxicity testing of nanomaterials - proposed modifications of OECD test guidelines based on laboratory experience with silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles.
Hund-Rinke K; Baun A; Cupi D; Fernandes TF; Handy R; Kinross JH; Navas JM; Peijnenburg W; Schlich K; Shaw BJ; Scott-Fordsmand JJ
Nanotoxicology; 2016 Dec; 10(10):1442-1447. PubMed ID: 27592624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.
Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Refinement of the ECETOC approach to identify endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals in ecotoxicology.
Weltje L; Wheeler JR; Weyers A; Galay-Burgos M
Toxicol Lett; 2013 Dec; 223(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 23467018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecotoxicity testing: science, politics and ethics.
Walker CH
Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 18333718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of 'endocrine substances': guidance on identifying endocrine disruptors.
Lewis RW
Toxicol Lett; 2013 Dec; 223(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 24036001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecotoxicological assessment of synthetic and biogenic surfactants using freshwater cladoceran species.
Santos VSV; Silveira E; Pereira BB
Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 221():519-525. PubMed ID: 30660908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 1. General overview and data availability for the first registration deadline.
Sobanska MA; Cesnaitis R; Sobanski T; Versonnen B; Bonnomet V; Tarazona JV; De Coen W
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():1225-32. PubMed ID: 24246945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clustering pesticides according to their molecular properties, fate, and effects by considering additional ecotoxicological parameters in the TyPol method.
Traoré H; Crouzet O; Mamy L; Sireyjol C; Rossard V; Servien R; Latrille E; Martin-Laurent F; Patureau D; Benoit P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(5):4728-4738. PubMed ID: 29197062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 3. Experimental sediment toxicity assays.
Cesnaitis R; Sobanska MA; Versonnen B; Sobanski T; Bonnomet V; Tarazona JV; De Coen W
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 475():116-22. PubMed ID: 24246252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving substance information in USEtox
Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined ecotoxicological risk assessment in the frame of European authorization of pesticides.
Panizzi S; Suciu NA; Trevisan M
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():136-146. PubMed ID: 28012656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ECOTOXicology Knowledgebase: A Curated Database of Ecologically Relevant Toxicity Tests to Support Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.
Olker JH; Elonen CM; Pilli A; Anderson A; Kinziger B; Erickson S; Skopinski M; Pomplun A; LaLone CA; Russom CL; Hoff D
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1520-1539. PubMed ID: 35262228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
