These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21592081)

  • 1. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
    He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.
    Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
    Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the searching abilities of HBOP and HBSITE for binding pocket detection.
    Oda A; Yamaotsu N; Hirono S
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Dec; 30(16):2728-37. PubMed ID: 19399761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Catalytic residues in hydrolases: analysis of methods designed for ligand-binding site prediction.
    Prymula K; Jadczyk T; Roterman I
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Feb; 25(2):117-33. PubMed ID: 21104192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved prediction of protein ligand-binding sites using random forests.
    Qiu Z; Wang X
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1212-8. PubMed ID: 21707519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PocketDepth: a new depth based algorithm for identification of ligand binding sites in proteins.
    Kalidas Y; Chandra N
    J Struct Biol; 2008 Jan; 161(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17949996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles.
    Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 22495747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting target-ligand interactions using protein ligand-binding site and ligand substructures.
    Wang C; Liu J; Luo F; Deng Z; Hu QN
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 25707321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical comparative assessment of predictions of protein-binding sites for biologically relevant organic compounds.
    Chen K; Mizianty MJ; Gao J; Kurgan L
    Structure; 2011 May; 19(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 21565696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein surface matching by combining local and global geometric information.
    Ellingson L; Zhang J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40540. PubMed ID: 22815760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
    Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
    Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.