These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21592328)

  • 1. The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000.
    Fairley L; Dundas R; Leyland AH
    BMC Public Health; 2011 May; 11():330. PubMed ID: 21592328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the relationship between affluence and elective caesarean sections.
    Alves B; Sheikh A
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):994-6. PubMed ID: 15958007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of socioeconomic factors on attaining targets for reducing teenage pregnancies.
    Smith T
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6887):1232-5. PubMed ID: 8499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable?
    Wilkinson C; McIlwaine G; Boulton-Jones C; Cole S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Jan; 105(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9442161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.
    Hure A; Powers J; Chojenta C; Loxton D
    Matern Child Health J; 2017 May; 21(5):1175-1184. PubMed ID: 28102500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A population study of birthweight and the risk of caesarean section: Scotland 1980-1996.
    Smith GC
    BJOG; 2000 Jun; 107(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 10847229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study.
    Bragg F; Cromwell DA; Edozien LC; Gurol-Urganci I; Mahmood TA; Templeton A; van der Meulen JH
    BMJ; 2010 Oct; 341():c5065. PubMed ID: 20926490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. After surgery: the effects of life-saving caesarean sections in Burkina Faso.
    Filippi V; Ganaba R; Calvert C; Murray SF; Storeng KT
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():348. PubMed ID: 26694035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in Indigenous and non-Indigenous caesarean section births in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1986-2012: a total population-based study.
    Thompson F; Dempsey K; Mishra G
    BJOG; 2016 Oct; 123(11):1814-23. PubMed ID: 26777399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in caesarean section in Western Australia, 1980-1987.
    Read AW; Waddell VP; Prendiville WJ; Stanley FJ
    Med J Aust; 1990 Sep; 153(6):318-23. PubMed ID: 2233449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mortality differences and inequalities within and between 'protected characteristics' groups, in a Scottish Cohort 1991-2009.
    Millard AD; Raab G; Lewsey J; Eaglesham P; Craig P; Ralston K; McCartney G
    Int J Equity Health; 2015 Nov; 14():142. PubMed ID: 26606921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and special educational needs in childhood: a population-based record linkage cohort study.
    Fitzpatrick KE; Kurinczuk JJ; Quigley MA
    BJOG; 2021 Dec; 128(13):2158-2168. PubMed ID: 34216080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.
    Schemann K; Patterson JA; Nippita TA; Ford JB; Roberts CL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Aug; 15():179. PubMed ID: 26285692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.
    Graham WJ; Hundley V; McCheyne AL; Hall MH; Gurney E; Milne J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10426639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study.
    O'Neill SM; Khashan AS; Henriksen TB; Kenny LC; Kearney PM; Mortensen PB; Greene RA; Agerbo E
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2560-8. PubMed ID: 25217610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.
    Liang J; Mu Y; Li X; Tang W; Wang Y; Liu Z; Huang X; Scherpbier RW; Guo S; Li M; Dai L; Deng K; Deng C; Li Q; Kang L; Zhu J; Ronsmans C
    BMJ; 2018 Mar; 360():k817. PubMed ID: 29506980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study.
    Kamara M; Henderson JJ; Doherty DA; Dickinson JE; Pennell CE
    BJOG; 2013 Jun; 120(7):879-86. PubMed ID: 23448347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal trends in socioeconomic inequalities in obesity prevalence among economically-active working-age adults in Scotland between 1995 and 2011: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study.
    Zhu J; Coombs N; Stamatakis E
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e006739. PubMed ID: 26088806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Socioeconomic differences in caesarean section - are they explained by medical need? An analysis of patient record data of a large Kenyan hospital.
    van der Spek L; Sanglier S; Mabeya HM; van den Akker T; Mertens PLJM; Houweling TAJ
    Int J Equity Health; 2020 Jul; 19(1):117. PubMed ID: 32641057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.