129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21592877)
1. A general method to assess the utility of the X-chromosomal markers in kinship testing.
Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 21592877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial.
Pinto N; Gusmão L; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 20457080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. General derivation of the sets of pedigrees with the same kinship coefficients.
Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 20720433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
Krawczak M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Key individuals for discerning pedigrees belonging to the same autosomal kinship class.
Gonçalves J; Conde-Sousa E; Egeland T; Amorim A; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():71-79. PubMed ID: 28380400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using X-chromosomal markers in relationship testing: calculation of likelihood ratios taking both linkage and linkage disequilibrium into account.
Tillmar AO; Egeland T; Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Mostad P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 21167800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis.
O'Connor KL; Tillmar AO
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):840-4. PubMed ID: 22542849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epistatic kinship a new measure of genetic diversity for short-term phylogenetic structures--theoretical investigations.
Flury C; Tietze M; Simianer H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 16706920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capillary electrophoresis of an X-chromosome STR decaplex for kinship deficiency cases.
Gusmão L; Alves C; Gomes I; Sánchez-Diz P
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 830():57-71. PubMed ID: 22139653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis.
Tillmar AO; Kling D; Butler JM; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Egeland T; Gusmão L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():269-275. PubMed ID: 28544956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The genetic variance for multiple linked quantitative trait loci conditional on marker information in a crossed population.
Matsuda H; Iwaisaki H
Heredity (Edinb); 2002 Jan; 88(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 11813099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes.
Szibor R; Krawczak M; Hering S; Edelmann J; Kuhlisch E; Krause D
Int J Legal Med; 2003 Apr; 117(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 12690502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future.
Szibor R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 19083736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the correlation of pairwise relatedness along chromosomes.
Hu XS
Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Mar; 94(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 15354191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of the IBD information into the weighted pairwise correlation method for linkage analysis.
Zinn-Justin A; Abel L
Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 10323183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterisation of the STR markers DXS10146, DXS10134 and DXS10147 located within a 79.1 kb region at Xq28.
Edelmann J; Hering S; Augustin C; Szibor R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19083788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
