266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21593674)
1. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Sillero C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 21593674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the variable-stiffness paediatric colonoscope more effective than a standard adult colonoscope for outpatient adult colonoscopy? A randomised controlled trial.
Al-Shurieki SH; Marshall JB
Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Sep; 37(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 15916930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
Dafnis GM
Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 10817176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of standard versus magnetic endoscope imaging colonoscopes for unsedated colonoscopy.
Shergill AK; McQuaid KR; Deleon A; McAnanama M; Shah JN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 May; 75(5):1031-1036.e1. PubMed ID: 22381532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study.
Park CH; Lee WS; Joo YE; Kim HS; Choi SK; Rew JS; Kim SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2504-10. PubMed ID: 17090280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope.
Kaltenbach T; Soetikno R; Friedland S
Dig Liver Dis; 2006 Dec; 38(12):921-5. PubMed ID: 16990055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Othman MO; Bradley AG; Choudhary A; Hoffman RM; Roy PK
Endoscopy; 2009 Jan; 41(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tapered colonoscope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy.
Anderson JC; Walker G; Birk JW; Alpern Z; Von Althen I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jun; 65(7):1042-7. PubMed ID: 17331512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.
Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.
Kaffes AJ; Mishra A; Ding SL; Hope R; Williams SJ; Gillespie PE; Bourke MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Nov; 58(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 14595301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
