266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21593674)
21. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope.
Kondo S; Yamaji Y; Watabe H; Yamada A; Sugimoto T; Ohta M; Ogura K; Okamoto M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Omata M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17100978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy.
Fritscher-Ravens A; Fox S; Swain CP; Milla P; Long G
Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16528644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Lee YT; Lai LH; Hui AJ; Wong VW; Ching JY; Wong GL; Wu JC; Chan HL; Leung WK; Lau JY; Sung JJ; Chan FK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19098847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").
Eickhoff A; van Dam J; Jakobs R; Kudis V; Hartmann D; Damian U; Weickert U; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 17156149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.
Luo DJ; Hui AJ; Yan KK; Ng SC; Wong VW; Chan FK; Cheong JP; Lam PP; Tse YK; Lau JY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 21963069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Harada Y; Hirasawa D; Fujita N; Noda Y; Kobayashi G; Ishida K; Yonechi M; Ito K; Suzuki T; Sugawara T; Horaguchi J; Takasawa O; Obana T; Oohira T; Onochi K; Kanno Y; Kuroha M; Iwai W
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):637-44. PubMed ID: 19251004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers.
Rösch T; Adler A; Pohl H; Wettschureck E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Hoepffner N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18355823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.
Saifuddin T; Trivedi M; King PD; Madsen R; Marshall JB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 10699777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time.
Lee HL; Eun CS; Lee OY; Jeon YC; Han DS; Sohn JH; Yoon BC; Choi HS; Hahm JS; Lee MH; Lee DH; Moon W; Kim SY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):503-8. PubMed ID: 19152904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy.
Rex DK; Chen SC; Overhiser AJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jul; 5(7):879-83. PubMed ID: 17544873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing different methods of activating the variable stiffness function of a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 71(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18218556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of responsive insertion technology (RIT) on reducing discomfort during colonoscopy: randomized clinical trial.
Pasternak A; Szura M; Solecki R; Matyja M; Szczepanik A; Matyja A
Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2247-2254. PubMed ID: 27631316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Push enteroscopy has a 96% cecal intubation rate in colonoscopies that failed because of redundant colons.
Jackson CS; Haq T; Olafsson S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 21689815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
