These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21595146)
1. [Evaluation of a new disposable insulin pen and injection habits of diabetes patients in everyday clinical practice]. Böhler S; Landgraf W; Schreiber SA MMW Fortschr Med; 2010 Jan; 151 Suppl 4():179-87. PubMed ID: 21595146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability, participant acceptance, and safety of a prefilled insulin injection device in a 3-month observational survey in everyday clinical practice in Australia. Carter J; Beilin J; Morton A; De Luise M J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 3(6):1425-38. PubMed ID: 20144398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a new reusable insulin pen (ClikSTAR) in Canadian patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine. Gottesman I; Perron P; Berard L; Stewart J; Basso N; Mettimano K; Elliott T Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Oct; 14(10):926-35. PubMed ID: 22775367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability of a pre-filled insulin injection device in a 3-month observational survey of everyday clinical practice in Australia. Carter J; Roberts A Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Oct; 24(10):2741-9. PubMed ID: 18715525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study. Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An analysis of patient acceptance and safety of a prefilled insulin injection device. Kroon L J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 3(6):1439-41. PubMed ID: 20144399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose accuracy and injection force dynamics of a novel disposable insulin pen. Clarke A; Spollett G Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2007 Mar; 4(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 17335413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Korytkowski M; Bell D; Jacobsen C; Suwannasari R; Clin Ther; 2003 Nov; 25(11):2836-48. PubMed ID: 14693308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the SoloSTAR insulin pen. Schwartz S; Vlajnic A Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Oct; 10(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 18715210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Pan-European and Canadian prospective survey to evaluate patient satisfaction with the SoloSTAR insulin injection device in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Hancu N; Czupryniak L; Genestin E; Sourij H J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1224-34. PubMed ID: 22027323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Administration technique and storage of disposable insulin pens reported by patients with diabetes. Mitchell VD; Porter K; Beatty SJ Diabetes Educ; 2012; 38(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 22722612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ease of Use of the Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Pen Injector in Insulin-Naïve People With Type 2 Diabetes. Pohlmeier H; Berard L; Brulle-Wohlhueter C; Wu J; Dahmen R; Nowotny I; Klonoff D J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 11(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 27664062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose accuracy comparison between SoloSTAR and FlexPen at three different dose levels. Penfornis A; Horvat K Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Oct; 10(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 18715211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of usability and patient preference for insulin pen needles produced with different production techniques: "thin-wall" needles compared to "regular-wall" needles: an open-label study. Siegmund T; Blankenfeld H; Schumm-Draeger PM Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Aug; 11(8):523-8. PubMed ID: 19698066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting. Davis SN; Wei W; Garg S Endocr Pract; 2011; 17(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 21550952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does pen help? A real-world outcomes study of switching from vial to disposable pen among insulin glargine-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Xie L; Zhou S; Wei W; Gill J; Pan C; Baser O Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Mar; 15(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23336845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient device assessment evaluation of two insulin injection devices in a mixed cohort of insulin-treated patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Schipper C; Musholt P; Niemeyer M; Qvist M; Löffler A; Forst T; Pfützner A Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Aug; 28(8):1297-303. PubMed ID: 22746353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the SoloSTAR insulin pen device: design verification and validation. Bode A Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2009 Jan; 6(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 19236211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses' perceptions and satisfaction with the use of insulin pen devices compared with insulin vial and syringes in an inpatient setting. Shogbon AO; Ngo D; Jacob B; Kimble LP; Ryan G Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Nov; 16(11):742-6. PubMed ID: 25198537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized, multinational, open-label, 2-period, crossover comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and biphasic insulin lispro 25 and pen devices in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Niskanen L; Jensen LE; Råstam J; Nygaard-Pedersen L; Erichsen K; Vora JP Clin Ther; 2004 Apr; 26(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 15189750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]