These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21596255)
1. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. Uçakhan ÖÖ; Cetinkor V; Özkan M; Kanpolat A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 37(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 21596255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera. Kovács I; Miháltz K; Ecsedy M; Németh J; Nagy ZZ Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 89(3):e251-6. PubMed ID: 21106048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. Piñero DP; Alió JL; Alesón A; Escaf Vergara M; Miranda M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):814-25. PubMed ID: 20457375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of normal and keratoconic corneas by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer. Demir S; Sönmez B; Yeter V; Ortak H Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 23642799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus. Demir S; Ortak H; Yeter V; Alim S; Sayn O; Taş U; Sönmez B Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and repeatability of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. Szalai E; Berta A; Hassan Z; Módis L J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 22261325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes. Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. Jafarinasab MR; Feizi S; Karimian F; Hasanpour H Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013; 23(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 23335313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam. Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of vector parameters characterizing the corneal astigmatism and regularity in clinical and subclinical keratoconus. Martínez-Abad A; Piñero DP; Ruiz-Fortes P; Artola A Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 27931882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Anterior, Posterior, and Total Corneal Astigmatism Measured Using a Single Scheimpflug Camera in Healthy and Keratoconus Eyes. Choi Y; Eom Y; Song JS; Kim HM Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):163-171. PubMed ID: 29770640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. Prospero Ponce CM; Rocha KM; Smith SD; Krueger RR J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19465292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes. Reddy JC; Rapuano CJ; Cater JR; Suri K; Nagra PK; Hammersmith KM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 24680519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]