708 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21596798)
1. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.
Georgieva M; Prantl L; Utpatel K; Wiesinger I; Stroszczynski C; Jung F; Jung EM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30584133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Downgrading of Breast Masses Suspicious for Cancer by Using Optoacoustic Breast Imaging.
Menezes GLG; Pijnappel RM; Meeuwis C; Bisschops R; Veltman J; Lavin PT; van de Vijver MJ; Mann RM
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 29664342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power Doppler and gray-scale sonography standardized by BI-RADS for the differentiation of benign postoperative lesion and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.
Kubota K; Iwasa H; Aoyama N; Hamada N; Nogami M; Tamura T; Nishioka A; Ogawa Y
Oncol Rep; 2011 Dec; 26(6):1357-62. PubMed ID: 21887473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
Gokalp G; Topal U; Kizilkaya E
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 18243623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic features of complex fibroadenomas of the breast.
Lee KH; Kim SJ; Park YM; Kim W; Yoon JH; Song JW; Kim SH; Lim YJ; Baek HJ; Kim SJ; Lee Y
J Clin Ultrasound; 2015; 43(9):556-62. PubMed ID: 26200475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power Doppler sonography: evaluation of solid breast lesions and correlation with lymph node metastasis.
Kwak JY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Choi SH; Son E; Oh KK
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 18502342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.
Spinelli Varella MA; Teixeira da Cruz J; Rauber A; Varella IS; Fleck JF; Moreira LF
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Added Value of Statistical Modeling of Backscatter Properties in the Management of Breast Lesions at US.
Trop I; Destrempes F; El Khoury M; Robidoux A; Gaboury L; Allard L; Chayer B; Cloutier G
Radiology; 2015 Jun; 275(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 25496215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
