BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21597105)

  • 1. Hybrid methods for improving information access in clinical documents: concept, assertion, and relation identification.
    Minard AL; Ligozat AL; Ben Abacha A; Bernhard D; Cartoni B; Deléger L; Grau B; Rosset S; Zweigenbaum P; Grouin C
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 21597105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of machine-learning-based approaches to extract clinical entities and their assertions from discharge summaries.
    Jiang M; Chen Y; Liu M; Rosenbloom ST; Mani S; Denny JC; Xu H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):601-6. PubMed ID: 21508414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A flexible framework for deriving assertions from electronic medical records.
    Roberts K; Harabagiu SM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 21724741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text.
    Uzuner Ö; South BR; Shen S; DuVall SL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 21685143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics.
    Jonnalagadda S; Cohen T; Wu S; Gonzalez G
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Feb; 45(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 22085698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A knowledge discovery and reuse pipeline for information extraction in clinical notes.
    Patrick JD; Nguyen DH; Wang Y; Li M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 21737844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MITRE system for clinical assertion status classification.
    Clark C; Aberdeen J; Coarr M; Tresner-Kirsch D; Wellner B; Yeh A; Hirschman L
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 21515542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using machine learning for concept extraction on clinical documents from multiple data sources.
    Torii M; Wagholikar K; Liu H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 21709161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic extraction of relations between medical concepts in clinical texts.
    Rink B; Harabagiu S; Roberts K
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 21846787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of RapTAT: a machine learning system for concept mapping of phrases from medical narratives.
    Gobbel GT; Reeves R; Jayaramaraja S; Giuse D; Speroff T; Brown SH; Elkin PL; Matheny ME
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():54-65. PubMed ID: 24316051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Concept Extraction with Lexical Semantics to Support Automatic Annotation.
    Abbas A; Afzal M; Hussain J; Ali T; Bilal HSM; Lee S; Jeon S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature engineering combined with machine learning and rule-based methods for structured information extraction from narrative clinical discharge summaries.
    Xu Y; Hong K; Tsujii J; Chang EI
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):824-32. PubMed ID: 22586067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical concept normalization with a hybrid natural language processing system combining multilevel matching and machine learning ranking.
    Chen L; Fu W; Gu Y; Sun Z; Li H; Li E; Jiang L; Gao Y; Huang Y
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1576-1584. PubMed ID: 33029642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraction of temporal relations from clinical free text: A systematic review of current approaches.
    Alfattni G; Peek N; Nenadic G
    J Biomed Inform; 2020 Aug; 108():103488. PubMed ID: 32673788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010.
    de Bruijn B; Cherry C; Kiritchenko S; Martin J; Zhu X
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 21565856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying active learning to assertion classification of concepts in clinical text.
    Chen Y; Mani S; Xu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Apr; 45(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 22127105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using an ensemble system to improve concept extraction from clinical records.
    Kang N; Afzal Z; Singh B; van Mulligen EM; Kors JA
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Jun; 45(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 22239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Machine learning-based coreference resolution of concepts in clinical documents.
    Ware H; Mullett CJ; Jagannathan V; El-Rawas O
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 22582205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Causality patterns and machine learning for the extraction of problem-action relations in discharge summaries.
    Seol JW; Yi W; Choi J; Lee KS
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Feb; 98():1-12. PubMed ID: 28034407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining unsupervised, supervised and rule-based learning: the case of detecting patient allergies in electronic health records.
    Berge GT; Granmo OC; Tveit TO; Ruthjersen AL; Sharma J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Sep; 23(1):188. PubMed ID: 37723446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.