These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21597252)

  • 1. Predicting predation through prey ontogeny using size-dependent functional response models.
    McCoy MW; Bolker BM; Warkentin KM; Vonesh JR
    Am Nat; 2011 Jun; 177(6):752-66. PubMed ID: 21597252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consequences of size structure in the prey for predator-prey dynamics: the composite functional response.
    Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 18284478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predation risk suppresses the positive feedback between size structure and cannibalism.
    Kishida O; Trussell GC; Ohno A; Kuwano S; Ikawa T; Nishimura K
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 21668893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experience.
    McCoy MW; Bolker BM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):478-86. PubMed ID: 18312336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prey dispersal rate affects prey species composition and trait diversity in response to multiple predators in metacommunities.
    Howeth JG; Leibold MA
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Sep; 79(5):1000-11. PubMed ID: 20584098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting prey population dynamics from kill rate, predation rate and predator-prey ratios in three wolf-ungulate systems.
    Vucetich JA; Hebblewhite M; Smith DW; Peterson RO
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 21569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive changes in prey vulnerability shape the response of predator populations to mortality.
    Abrams PA
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Nov; 261(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 19643111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillations in a size-structured prey-predator model.
    Bhattacharya S; Martcheva M
    Math Biosci; 2010 Nov; 228(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 20800071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prey life-history and bioenergetic responses across a predation gradient.
    Rennie MD; Purchase CF; Shuter BJ; Collins NC; Abrams PA; Morgan GE
    J Fish Biol; 2010 Oct; 77(6):1230-51. PubMed ID: 21039502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of predation by the larvae of Toxorhynchites splendens on the aquatic stages of Aedes aegypti.
    Dominic Amalraj D; Das PK
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1998 Mar; 29(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 9740296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey.
    Preisser EL; Bolnick DI; Grabowski JH
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 19243407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stochastic modelling of prey depletion processes.
    Clerc T; Davison AC; Bersier LF
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(3):523-32. PubMed ID: 19409907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.
    Goss-Custard JD; West AD; Yates MG; Caldow RW; Stillman RA; Bardsley L; Castilla J; Castro M; Dierschke V; Durell SE; Eichhorn G; Ens BJ; Exo KM; Udayangani-Fernando PU; Ferns PN; Hockey PA; Gill JA; Johnstone I; Kalejta-Summers B; Masero JA; Moreira F; Nagarajan RV; Owens IP; Pacheco C; Perez-Hurtado A; Rogers D; Scheiffarth G; Sitters H; Sutherland WJ; Triplet P; Worrall DH; Zharikov Y; Zwarts L; Pettifor RA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):501-29. PubMed ID: 16863594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model.
    Persson L; Leonardsson K; de Roos AM; Gyllenberg M; Christensen B
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Dec; 54(3):270-93. PubMed ID: 9878605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Size-dependent predation risk in tree-feeding insects with different colouration strategies: a field experiment.
    Remmel T; Tammaru T
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Sep; 78(5):973-80. PubMed ID: 19493131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
    Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments.
    Meissner K; Muotka T
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Mar; 75(2):421-33. PubMed ID: 16637995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transient dynamics limit the effectiveness of keystone predation in bringing about coexistence.
    Noonburg EG; Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 15729663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should "handled" prey be considered? Some consequences for functional response, predator-prey dynamics and optimal foraging theory.
    Krivan V; Vrkoc I
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Mar; 227(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 14990381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.