These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21598118)

  • 1. Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.
    Goel VK; Faizan A; Palepu V; Bhattacharya S
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S688-99. PubMed ID: 21598118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation.
    Faizan A; Goel VK; Garfin SR; Bono CM; Serhan H; Biyani A; Elgafy H; Krishna M; Friesem T
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S653-62. PubMed ID: 19936805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
    Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of assigned material combination in a simulated total cervical disc replacement design on kinematics of a model of the full cervical spine: A finite element analysis study.
    Qi Y; Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2016; 27(6):633-646. PubMed ID: 28234246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion.
    Martin S; Ghanayem AJ; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1359-66. PubMed ID: 21629170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total Disk Replacement Adjacent to a Multilevel Fusion in the Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Motion Analysis.
    Segal DN; Grabel ZJ; Wilson JM; Milby AH; Shi WJ; Hutton WC; Rhee JM
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e881-e889. PubMed ID: 30391767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Biomechanical Analysis of an Artificial Disc With a Shock-absorbing Core Property by Using Whole-cervical Spine Finite Element Analysis.
    Lee JH; Park WM; Kim YH; Jahng TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Aug; 41(15):E893-E901. PubMed ID: 26825785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The biomechanics of hyperextension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine].
    Stein G; Meyer C; Ingenhoff L; Bredow J; Müller LP; Eysel P; Schiffer G
    Unfallchirurg; 2017 Jul; 120(7):590-594. PubMed ID: 27220520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element modeling of kinematic and load transmission alterations due to cervical intervertebral disc replacement.
    Womack W; Leahy PD; Patel VV; Puttlitz CM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 21785298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure analysis of C-5 after total disc replacement with ProDisc-C at 1 and 2 levels and in combination with a fusion cage: finite-element and biomechanical models.
    Completo A; Nascimento A; Ramos A; Simões J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jun; 22(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 25746118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
    Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Axial Position of Center of Rotation of a Cervical Total Disc Replacement on Biomechanical Parameters: Simulated 2-Level Replacement Based on a Validated Model.
    Li Y; Zhang Z; Liao Z; Mo Z; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():932-938. PubMed ID: 28736356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review.
    Veruva SY; Steinbeck MJ; Toth J; Alexander DD; Kurtz SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3759-69. PubMed ID: 25002211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs.
    Gandhi AA; Kode S; DeVries NA; Grosland NM; Smucker JD; Fredericks DC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):1578-85. PubMed ID: 26165217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical disc replacement with a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of endplate.
    Lou J; Li Y; Wang B; Meng Y; Gong Q; Liu H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 13(1):41. PubMed ID: 29482611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review.
    Harrod CC; Hilibrand AS; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. PubMed ID: 22872222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strain behavior of malaligned cervical spine implanted with metal-on-polyethylene, metal-on-metal, and elastomeric artificial disc prostheses - A finite element analysis.
    Chen WM; Jin J; Park T; Ryu KS; Lee SJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Nov; 59():19-26. PubMed ID: 30119037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.