These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21598844)

  • 1. Impartiality and disability discrimination.
    Bognar G
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2011 Mar; 21(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 21598844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Justice and the ADA: does prioritizing and rationing health care discriminate against the disabled?
    Brock DW
    Soc Philos Policy; 1995; 12(2):159-85. PubMed ID: 11653122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Destructuring disability: rationing of health care and unfair discrimination against the sick.
    Orentlicher D
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1996; 31(1):49-87. PubMed ID: 11660333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justice between age groups: an objection to the prudential lifespan approach.
    Jecker NS
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 23862590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inequalities in health and intergenerational equity.
    Williams A
    Ethical Theory Moral Pract; 1999; 2(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15015523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rationing through choice: a new approach to cost-effectiveness analysis in health care.
    Rai AK
    Indiana Law J; 1997; 72(4):1015-97. PubMed ID: 11658223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The distribution of life-saving medical resources: equality, life expectancy, and choice behind the veil.
    Stein MS
    Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):212-45. PubMed ID: 12678088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rationing fairly: programmatic considerations.
    Daniels N
    Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):224-33. PubMed ID: 11651535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilitarianism and the disabled: distribution of resources.
    Stein MS
    Bioethics; 2002 Feb; 16(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12061381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: a preliminary normative analysis.
    Menzel P; Dolan P; Richardson J; Olsen JA
    Soc Sci Med; 2002 Dec; 55(12):2149-58. PubMed ID: 12409128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review.
    Anand S; Hanson K
    J Health Econ; 1997 Dec; 16(6):685-702. PubMed ID: 10176779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving value measurement in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ubel PA; Nord E; Gold M; Menzel P; Prades JL; Richardson J
    Med Care; 2000 Sep; 38(9):892-901. PubMed ID: 10982111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health care rationing and disability rights.
    Peters PG
    Indiana Law J; 1995; 70(2):491-547. PubMed ID: 11660218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QALYs, age and fairness.
    Kappel K; Sandøe P
    Bioethics; 1992 Oct; 6(4):297-316. PubMed ID: 11652092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No body is expendable: Medical rationing and disability justice during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Andrews EE; Ayers KB; Brown KS; Dunn DS; Pilarski CR
    Am Psychol; 2021 Apr; 76(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 32700936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is cost-effectiveness analysis unfair?
    Russell LB
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(2):232-4. PubMed ID: 15090108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Administrative gatekeeping - a third way between unrestricted patient advocacy and bedside rationing.
    Lauridsen S
    Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):311-20. PubMed ID: 18410460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [QALYs and fairness: health economic approaches to the fairness issue and their problems].
    Klonschinski A; Lübbe W
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Oct; 73(10):688-95. PubMed ID: 21259190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response to open peer commentaries on "Justice between age groups: an objection to the prudential lifespan approach".
    Jecker NS
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(10):W10-2. PubMed ID: 25229599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethicists struggle to judge the 'value' of life.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Nov; ():C2, C3. PubMed ID: 11646961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.