These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21599833)

  • 1. Effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides.
    D'haese J; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 21599833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
    D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.
    Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G
    J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 23593625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study.
    Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S; Barbato E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):448-59. PubMed ID: 21745330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deviations between placed and planned implant positions: an accuracy pilot study of skeletally supported stereolithographic surgical templates.
    Stübinger S; Buitrago-Tellez C; Cantelmi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 23167722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers.
    Chrcanovic BR; Oliveira DR; Custódio AL
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereoscopic technique for conversion of radiographic guide into implant surgical guide.
    Chan PW; Chik FF; Pow EH; Chow TW
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 21985642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Calasso S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.
    Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Guerrero ME; Hirsch E; Schutyser F; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 17716317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients.
    Pettersson A; Komiyama A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 20491812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
    Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.