These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2160012)
1. Initial interface between submerged hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy implant and mandibular bone after nontapping and tapping insertions in monkeys. Akagawa Y; Satomi K; Nikai H; Tsuru H J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 2160012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone-implant interface structures after nontapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants. Satomi K; Akagawa Y; Nikai H; Tsuru H J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 3162274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants. Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis. Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of hydroxyapatite and titanium dental implants in dogs. Kohri M; Cooper EP; Ferracane JL; Waite DF J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Dec; 48(12):1265-73. PubMed ID: 2172495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loaded hydroxylapatite-coated and grit-blasted titanium implants in dogs. Block MS; Finger IM; Fontenot MG; Kent JN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 2561673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The advantages of coated titanium implants prepared by radiofrequency sputtering from hydroxyapatite. Cooley DR; Van Dellen AF; Burgess JO; Windeler AS J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jan; 67(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 1312597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate loading of titanium plasma-sprayed implants: an histologic analysis in monkeys. Piattelli A; Corigliano M; Scarano A; Costigliola G; Paolantonio M J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 9579618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and healed sites. Yukna RA J Periodontol; 1991 Jul; 62(7):468-72. PubMed ID: 1656010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible. Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant. I: A morphometric evaluation in initial healing. Wadamoto M; Akagawa Y; Sato Y; Kubo T J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Aug; 76(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 8820809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone of immediate or delayed occlusal-loaded non-splinted implants in the posterior mandible--an experimental study in monkeys. Stokholm R; Isidor F; Nyengaard JR Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 24118392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and histologic evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a preliminary study in dogs. Kohal RJ; De LaRosa M; Patrick D; Hürzeler MB; Caffesse RG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):824-34. PubMed ID: 10612919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. Pilliar RM; Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pharoah M; Chipman M; Valiquette N; Carter S; De Groot K J Dent Res; 1991 Oct; 70(10):1338-45. PubMed ID: 1658099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postmortem histologic evaluation of mandibular titanium and maxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from 1 patient. Rohrer MD; Sobczak RR; Prasad HS; Morris HF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):579-86. PubMed ID: 10453675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis. Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone reaction adjacent to microplasma-sprayed calcium phosphate-coated oral implants subjected to an occlusal load, an experimental study in the dog. Junker R; Manders PJ; Wolke J; Borisov Y; Braceras I; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 21070381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]