142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21600551)
1. Should patients with cytologic high-grade intraepithelial lesions of the cervix be treated without colposcopic-guided biopsy?
Ulrich D; Tamussino K; Reich O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):e8-9; author reply e9. PubMed ID: 21600551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy.
Zhang X; Dou Y; Wang M; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():53-58. PubMed ID: 28850822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.
Ye J; Cheng XD; Cheng B; Cheng YF; Chen XJ; Lu WG
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30700264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of colposcopic-cytologic examinations and microscopic biopsy findings].
Marcinkowski Z
Ginekol Pol; 1978 Apr; 49(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 680572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical pathology.
Macfarlan SM; Cowgill JS; Appel TB
Rocky Mt Med J; 1979; 76(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 523895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading colposcopic appearance: paired comparison between two methods for differentiating benign papillomaviral infection from high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix.
Carriero C; Di Gesù A; Conte R; Ferreri R; Loizzi P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1991 Feb; 34(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 1671368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Colposcopic verification of cytological examinations of the cervix uteri in women].
Malarewicz A; Rosiak J; Kowalski W; Wołowiec L
Ginekol Pol; 1984 Aug; 55(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 6526333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040).
Ouh YT; Park JJ; Kang M; Kim M; Song JY; Shin SJ; Shim SH; Yoo HJ; Lee M; Lee SJ; Shin W; Chong GO; Choi MC; Choi CH; Min KJ
J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 36(24):e164. PubMed ID: 34155836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities.
Solomon D; Stoler M; Jeronimo J; Khan M; Castle P; Schiffman M
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):288-95. PubMed ID: 17666602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acetic acid visualization of the cervix to detect cervical dysplasia.
Van Le L; Broekhuizen FF; Janzer-Steele R; Behar M; Samter T
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):293-5. PubMed ID: 8423967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [THe role of biopsy in the early diagnosis of cancer of the cervix uteri].
Buţureanu S; Pricop F; Stratan E; Rădulescu D; Patraş C; Dragomir D; Dumitrache F; Gheorghiţă V; Popovici C; Popovici R
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1990; 94(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 2075312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Colposcopic-histologic results in 97 patients with mild dysplasia shown by Pap test].
Crescini C; Pezzica E; Artuso A; Comerio D; Reale D; Bonaldi A
Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Nov; 43(11):509-12. PubMed ID: 1784407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The increased detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia when using a second biopsy at colposcopy.
van der Marel J; van Baars R; Rodriguez A; Quint WG; van de Sandt MM; Berkhof J; Schiffman M; Torné A; Ordi J; Jenkins D; Verheijen RH; Helmerhorst TJ; Ter Harmsel B; Wentzensen N; Del Pino M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25204846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance and adenocarcinoma in situ: summoning colposcopic expertise?
Ferris DG; Krumholz BA; Jester DM; Crosby JH; Hanly MG; Messing MJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Aug; 43(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 8708629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytology at the time of cervical colposcopy.
Tapisiz OL; Ertan K; Tyner J; Borahay M; Freeman DH; Kilic GS
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23589997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and condyloma: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy of posttreatment follow-up methods.
Falcone T; Ferenczy A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Feb; 154(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 3946513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Should colposcopy be systematically performed on all women presenting with cytologic anomalies?].
Boulanger JC
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Dec; 28(12):945-7. PubMed ID: 11192206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
