These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21600615)

  • 1. Methodological concerns and quality appraisal of contemporary systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric urology.
    Braga LH; Pemberton J; Demaria J; Lorenzo AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):266-71. PubMed ID: 21600615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China].
    Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting to grips with systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Davies HT; Crombie IK
    Hosp Med; 1998 Dec; 59(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 10696361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
    Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.