These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21601340)

  • 1. Deidentification of facial images using composites.
    Engelstad ME; McClellan M; Jacko JA; Melton GB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):3026-31. PubMed ID: 21601340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Holistic face processing can inhibit recognition of forensic facial composites.
    McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ; Frowd CD; Langton SR
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 26436334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity effects in the construction of facial-composite images using modern software systems.
    Frowd CD; Skelton FC; Butt N; Hassan A; Fields S; Hancock PJ
    Ergonomics; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1147-58. PubMed ID: 22103723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial recognition from volume-rendered magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Prior FW; Brunsden B; Hildebolt C; Nolan TS; Pringle M; Vaishnavi SN; Larson-Prior LJ
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jan; 13(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 19129018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of methods of providing anonymity in facial photographs; a randomised controlled study.
    Clover AJ; Fitzpatrick E; Healy C
    Ir Med J; 2010 Sep; 103(8):243-5. PubMed ID: 21046866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of appearance transfer and persistence in central face transplantation: a computer simulation analysis.
    Pomahac B; Aflaki P; Nelson C; Balas B
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 May; 63(5):733-8. PubMed ID: 19398394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exposure to 'ideal' facial images reduces facial satisfaction: an experimental study.
    Newton JT; Minhas G
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 16262608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of perceived visibility enhancement with image processing for single face images: a preliminary study.
    Mei M; Leat SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4502-8. PubMed ID: 19369243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is family special to the brain? An event-related fMRI study of familiar, familial, and self-face recognition.
    Platek SM; Kemp SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):849-58. PubMed ID: 19159636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of idealised facial images on satisfaction with facial appearance: comparing 'ideal' and 'average' faces.
    Williams DM; Bentley R; Cobourne MT; Gibilaro A; Good S; Huppa C; Matthews NS; O'Higgins L; Patel S; Newton JT
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):711-7. PubMed ID: 18639969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of face similarity in the case of the perception of morphed self-face.
    Yoon HW; Kircher TT
    Int J Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 115(6):839-49. PubMed ID: 16019577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.
    Pierce K; Haist F; Sedaghat F; Courchesne E
    Brain; 2004 Dec; 127(Pt 12):2703-16. PubMed ID: 15319275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implications of surface-rendered facial CT images in patient privacy.
    Chen JJ; Juluru K; Morgan T; Moffitt R; Siddiqui KM; Siegel EL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jun; 202(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 24848824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Configural and featural information in facial-composite images.
    Frowd CD; Jones S; Fodarella C; Skelton F; Fields S; Williams A; Marsh JE; Thorley R; Nelson L; Greenwood L; Date L; Kearley K; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):215-27. PubMed ID: 24796951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence.
    Eger E; Schweinberger SR; Dolan RJ; Henson RN
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):1128-39. PubMed ID: 15961049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?
    Gothard KM; Erickson CA; Amaral DG
    Anim Cogn; 2004 Jan; 7(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 14745584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex.
    Ewbank MP; Andrews TJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1857-70. PubMed ID: 18343161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different fusiform activity to stranger and personally familiar faces in shy and social adults.
    Beaton EA; Schmidt LA; Schulkin J; Antony MM; Swinson RP; Hall GB
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 19322727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.