These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21601666)

  • 1. Ethical application of Shared Risk programs in assisted reproductive technology.
    Levens ED; Levy MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2198-9. PubMed ID: 21601666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial experience with a risk-sharing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program with novel features.
    Stassart JP; Bayless RB; Casey CL; Phipps WR
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2192-7. PubMed ID: 20655522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Money-back guarantees.
    Levens ED; Richter KS; Levy MJ
    Semin Reprod Med; 2013 May; 31(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23609150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Financial "risk-sharing" or refund programs in assisted reproduction: an Ethics Committee opinion.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):e8-e11. PubMed ID: 27450188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shared-risk or refund programs in assisted reproduction.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S249-50. PubMed ID: 15363742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk-sharing or refund programs in assisted reproduction: a committee opinion.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):334-6. PubMed ID: 23472947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization.
    Van Voorhis BJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17251534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infertility treatment and neonatal care: the ethical obligation to transcend specialty practice in the interest of reducing multiple births.
    White GB; Leuthner SR
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11789065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?
    Wilkinson D; Schaefer GO; Tremellen K; Savulescu J
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2015 Apr; 36(2):121-39. PubMed ID: 25813034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2003.
    Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson GD; de Mouzon J
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2209-22, 2222.e1-17. PubMed ID: 21536284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives.
    Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART.
    van Empel IW; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1242-5. PubMed ID: 18372252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation.
    Ahmad NH
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    de Mouzon J; Goossens V; Bhattacharya S; Castilla JA; Ferraretti AP; Korsak V; Kupka M; Nygren KG; Nyboe Andersen A;
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Aug; 25(8):1851-62. PubMed ID: 20570973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome.
    Johnston-Macananny EB; Baxter JK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):953; author reply 953-4. PubMed ID: 16582140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Financing high-tech reproductive medical expenditures.
    Mueller MW
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 12645603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why do couples refuse or discontinue ART?
    Dawson AA; Diedrich K; Felberbaum RE
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Nov; 273(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16080011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six cases of tubal stump pregnancy: complication of assisted reproductive technology?
    Ko PC; Liang CC; Lo TS; Huang HY
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2432.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21497804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ["Brave New World". Human embryo cloning: what is possible and what is eligible?].
    Janson PO; Fridén B
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Feb; 101(9):760-3. PubMed ID: 15045838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cost-effectiveness comparison of embryo donation with oocyte donation.
    Finger R; Sommerfelt C; Freeman M; Wilson CK; Wade A; Daly D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):379-81. PubMed ID: 19406398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.