516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21605357)
1. Logistic random effects regression models: a comparison of statistical packages for binary and ordinal outcomes.
Li B; Lingsma HF; Steyerberg EW; Lesaffre E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():77. PubMed ID: 21605357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian hierarchical models for multi-level repeated ordinal data using WinBUGS.
Qiu Z; Song PX; Tan M
J Biopharm Stat; 2002 May; 12(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 12413235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors.
Al Amer FM; Thompson CG; Lin L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33801771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating multilevel logistic regression models when the number of clusters is low: a comparison of different statistical software procedures.
Austin PC
Int J Biostat; 2010 Apr; 6(1):Article 16. PubMed ID: 20949128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian Approach for Summarizing and Modeling Time-Series Exposure Data with Left Censoring.
Houseman EA; Virji MA
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):773-783. PubMed ID: 28810680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.
Muff S; Signer J; Fieberg J
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 31454066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A menu-driven software package of Bayesian nonparametric (and parametric) mixed models for regression analysis and density estimation.
Karabatsos G
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):335-362. PubMed ID: 26956682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).
Ma J; Thabane L; Kaczorowski J; Chambers L; Dolovich L; Karwalajtys T; Levitt C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations in hierarchical Bayesian models for population pharmacokinetics.
Dodds MG; Vicini P
Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 32(9):1300-13. PubMed ID: 15493516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction models for clustered data with informative priors for the random effects: a simulation study.
Ni H; Groenwold RHH; Nielen M; Klugkist I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 30081875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R.
Vogelgesang F; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):111-119. PubMed ID: 29719917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian regression in SAS software.
Sullivan SG; Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 42(1):308-17. PubMed ID: 23230299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of computational algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials.
Chen Z; Berger JS; Castellucci LA; Farkouh M; Goligher EC; Hade EM; Hunt BJ; Kornblith LZ; Lawler PR; Leifer ES; Lorenzi E; Neal MD; Zarychanski R; Heath A
Clin Trials; 2024 May; ():17407745241247334. PubMed ID: 38752434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. II. Regression analysis.
Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 36(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 17329317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing Bayesian and frequentist approaches for multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.
Hong H; Carlin BP; Shamliyan TA; Wyman JF; Ramakrishnan R; Sainfort F; Kane RL
Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):702-14. PubMed ID: 23549384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
