These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21605789)

  • 1. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):3202-11. PubMed ID: 21605789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada.
    Wiggans GR; Sonstegard TS; VanRaden PM; Matukumalli LK; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Schenkel FS; Van Tassell CP
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3431-6. PubMed ID: 19528621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection and management of DNA markers for use in genomic evaluation.
    Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM; Bacheller LR; Tooker ME; Hutchison JL; Cooper TA; Sonstegard TS
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2287-92. PubMed ID: 20412945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confirmation and discovery of maternal grandsires and great-grandsires in dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; O'Connell JR; Bacheller LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1874-9. PubMed ID: 23332849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions.
    Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Vanraden PM; Cole JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6188-93. PubMed ID: 22118107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
    Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the Illumina Bovine3K BeadChip in dairy genomic evaluation.
    Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Vanraden PM; Olson KM; Tooker ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22365235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: relationship of call rate and accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in dairy cattle.
    Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3336-9. PubMed ID: 23497995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry.
    Funk DA
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1362-8. PubMed ID: 16537967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle.
    Weigel KA; de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Van Tassell CP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5423-35. PubMed ID: 20965358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imputation of genotypes from different single nucleotide polymorphism panels in dairy cattle.
    Druet T; Schrooten C; de Roos AP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5443-54. PubMed ID: 20965360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.
    VanRaden PM; Van Tassell CP; Wiggans GR; Sonstegard TS; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 19109259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle.
    Olson KM; Vanraden PM; Tooker ME; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2613-20. PubMed ID: 21524553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.