These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21606013)

  • 1. Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim's skin.
    de Bruin KG; Verheij SM; Veenhoven M; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 21606013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation into "normal" background DNA on adult necks: implications for DNA profiling of manual strangulation victims.
    Graham EA; Rutty GN
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1074-82. PubMed ID: 18624892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of offender DNA following skin-to-skin contact with a victim.
    Bowman ZE; Mosse KSA; Sungaila AM; van Oorschot RAH; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():252-259. PubMed ID: 30268683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast and simple DNA extraction from saliva and sperm cells obtained from the skin or isolated from swabs.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Mályusz V; Fremdt H; Koch C; Simeoni E; Schwark T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2006 May; 8(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16516526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of DNA evidence recovered from epithelial cells in penile swabs.
    Drobnic K
    Croat Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 12808732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation into the transference and survivability of human DNA following simulated manual strangulation with consideration of the problem of third party contamination.
    Rutty GN
    Int J Legal Med; 2002 Jun; 116(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 12111321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of contact force on forensic trace collection efficiency when sampling textiles with adhesive tape.
    Damsteeg-van Berkel S; Beemster F; Dankelman J; Loeve AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():278-283. PubMed ID: 30925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA preparation from sexual assault cases by selective degradation of contaminating DNA from the victim.
    Garvin AM; Bottinelli M; Gola M; Conti A; Soldati G
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1297-303. PubMed ID: 19818111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MtDNA typing of single-sperm cells isolated by micromanipulation.
    Pereira J; Neves R; Forat S; Huckenbeck W; Olek K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 21680273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance characteristics of commercial Y-STR multiplex systems.
    Mayntz-Press KA; Ballantyne J
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 17681001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of salivary DNA from the skin after showering.
    Williams S; Panacek E; Green W; Kanthaswamy S; Hopkins C; Calloway C
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Mar; 11(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 25534825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of preprocessing methods and storage times for touch DNA samples.
    Dong H; Wang J; Zhang T; Ge JY; Dong YQ; Sun QF; Liu C; Li CX
    Croat Med J; 2017 Feb; 58(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 28252870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
    Nori DV; McCord BR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
    Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29685301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applicability of DNA analysis on adhesive tape in forensic casework.
    Zech WD; Malik N; Thali M
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1036-41. PubMed ID: 22390214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.