252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21606308)
1. Mucocele-like tumors of the breast as cystic lesions: sonographic-pathologic correlation.
Kim SM; Kim HH; Kang DK; Shin HJ; Cho N; Park JM; Cha JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1424-30. PubMed ID: 21606308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Original report. Mucocele-like tumors of the breast: mammographic and sonographic appearances.
Glazebrook K; Reynolds C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 12646434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benign and malignant mucocele-like tumors of the breast: mammographic and sonographic appearances.
Kim JY; Han BK; Choe YH; Ko YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1310-6. PubMed ID: 16247155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy.
Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Yu CP; Chang WC; Tung HJ; Lin WC; Tsai SH; Huang GS
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 22161618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):1135-41. PubMed ID: 19304725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benign mucocele-like lesion of the breast: how to differentiate from mucinous carcinoma before surgery.
Cheng L; Lee WY; Chang TW
Cytopathology; 2004 Apr; 15(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 15056171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization.
Liberman L; Kaplan J; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; LaTrenta LR; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 11517048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
Ha SM; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170787. PubMed ID: 29658793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Typical and unusual sonoelastographic patterns of breast cystic lesions: impact on BI-RADS classification.
Chiorean AR; Duma MM; Dudea SM; Bolboaca S; Dumitriu D; Eniu D; Sfrangeu SA
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E138-E144. PubMed ID: 20972948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy--success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADSTM-correlated indication].
Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Fischmann A; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12525989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions.
Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.
Taskin F; Koseoglu K; Ozbas S; Erkus M; Karaman C
J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Jun; 40(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 22508447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mucocelelike Lesions in the Breast: Radiologic and Clinicopathologic Correlations With Upgrade Rate.
Ha SM; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Kim HH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 29702014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
