143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21606313)
1. MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors.
Kim JA; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Jeong J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1450-6. PubMed ID: 21606313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade.
Jansen SA; Newstead GM; Abe H; Shimauchi A; Schmidt RA; Karczmar GS
Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 18024450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced MRI of ductal carcinoma in situ: characteristics of a new intensity-modulated parametric mapping technique correlated with histopathologic findings.
Mariano MN; van den Bosch MA; Daniel BL; Nowels KW; Birdwell RL; Fong KJ; Desmond PS; Plevritis S; Stables LA; Zakhour M; Herfkens RJ; Ikeda DM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Oct; 22(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 16142701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging.
Facius M; Renz DM; Neubauer H; Böttcher J; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17996602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology.
Badan GM; Roveda D; Paito S; Fleury Ede F; Maragno B; Campos MS; Ferreira CA; Ferreira FA
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016; 62(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 27656851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
Hsu HH; Chang TH; Chou YC; Peng YJ; Ko KH; Chang WC; Lin YP; Hsu GC; Yu JC
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer.
Wang X; Xu P; Wang Y; Grant EG
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 21498359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: correlation with mammographic and pathologic findings.
Schoonjans JM; Brem RF
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Jul; 19(7):449-57. PubMed ID: 10898298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Viehweg P; Lampe D; Buchmann J; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
MAGMA; 2000 Dec; 11(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 11154954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20729462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features.
Raza S; Vallejo M; Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):689-99. PubMed ID: 18716095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
