These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21606646)

  • 1. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
    von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
    Guan T; Zhu Z; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
    Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Gstoettner WK; Van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Kiefer J; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; McDonald S; Cavallé L; Valdecasas JG; Adunka OF; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Helbig S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 21997337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric stimulation complements functional residual hearing in partial deafness.
    Podskarbi-Fayette R; Pilka A; Skarzynski H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 130(8):888-96. PubMed ID: 20105110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Wilson BS
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():56-66. PubMed ID: 21756584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing preservation in partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski PH
    Med Sci Monit; 2010 Nov; 16(11):CR555-62. PubMed ID: 20980961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Adunka MC; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1049-54. PubMed ID: 20351607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation.
    Gstoettner WK; van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; Mcdonald S; Cavallé L; Helbig S; Valdecasas JG; Anderson I; Adunka OF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):968-75. PubMed ID: 19086194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear reimplantation after surgery for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Helbig S; Helbig M; Rader T; Mack M; Baumann U
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19571603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.