These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21608112)

  • 1. A Bayesian network model for integrative river rehabilitation planning and management.
    Borsuk ME; Schweizer S; Reichert P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 21608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effective river rehabilitation planning: optimizing for morphological benefits at large spatial scales.
    Langhans SD; Hermoso V; Linke S; Bunn SE; Possingham HP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():296-303. PubMed ID: 24325822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale.
    Gilvear DJ; Spray CJ; Casas-Mulet R
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 126():30-43. PubMed ID: 23659798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian networks and adaptive management of wildlife habitat.
    Howes AL; Maron M; McAlpine CA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):974-83. PubMed ID: 20184652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. River environmental decision support system development for Suzhou Creek in Shanghai.
    Liao Z; Xu Z; Wang D; Lu S; Hannam PM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2211-21. PubMed ID: 21546149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fully connected Bayesian belief networks: a modeling procedure with a case study of the Ganges river basin.
    Varis O; Rahaman MM; Kajander T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 21591248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participatory modelling to support decision making in water management under uncertainty: two comparative case studies in the Guadiana river basin, Spain.
    Carmona G; Varela-Ortega C; Bromley J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():400-12. PubMed ID: 23792817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.
    Wright HE
    Science; 1974 Nov; 186(4163):487-95. PubMed ID: 17790369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management.
    Barton DN; Kuikka S; Varis O; Uusitalo L; Henriksen HJ; Borsuk M; de la Hera A; Farmani R; Johnson S; Linnell JD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):418-29. PubMed ID: 22707420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating modeling, monitoring, and management to reduce critical uncertainties in water resource decision making.
    Peterson JT; Freeman MC
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 2):361-370. PubMed ID: 27012362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of river ecosystem models for Flemish watercourses: case studies in the Zwalm river basin.
    Goethals P; Dedecker A; Raes N; Adriaenssens V; Gabriels W; De Pauw N
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 15952431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new rule generation method to develop a decision support system for integrated management at river basin scale.
    Benedetti L; Prat P; Nopens I; Poch M; Poch M; Turon C; De Baets B; Comas J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2035-40. PubMed ID: 19844050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bringing diverse knowledge sources together--a meta-model for supporting integrated catchment management.
    Holzkämper A; Kumar V; Surridge BW; Paetzold A; Lerner DN
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 96(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 22208404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Terrestrial reserve networks do not adequately represent aquatic ecosystems.
    Herbert ME; McIntyre PB; Doran PJ; Allan JD; Abell R
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 20337671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a preliminary relative risk model for evaluating regional ecological conditions in the Delaware River Estuary, USA.
    Iannuzzi TJ; Durda JL; Preziosi DV; Ludwig DF; Stahl RG; DeSantis AA; Hoke RA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):164-79. PubMed ID: 19689170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open rivers: barrier removal planning and the restoration of free-flowing rivers.
    O'Hanley JR
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Dec; 92(12):3112-20. PubMed ID: 21880412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fish-passage facilities as ecological traps in large neotropical rivers.
    Pelicice FM; Agostinho AA
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 18254863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive management and water temperature variability within a South African river system: what are the management options?
    Rivers-Moore NA; Jewitt GP
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 16563604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obtaining natural-like flow releases in diverted river reaches from simple riparian benefit economic models.
    Perona P; Dürrenmatt DJ; Characklis GW
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 118():161-9. PubMed ID: 23428465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.