34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21609247)
1. Classifying human voices by using hybrid SFX time-series preprocessing and ensemble feature selection.
Fong S; Lan K; Wong R
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():720834. PubMed ID: 24288684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship Between Vocal Fatigue Index and Acoustic Voice Scales in Patients With Coronavirus Infection.
Saki N; Nasiri R; Bayat A; Nikakhlagh S; Salmanzadeh S; Khoramshahi H
J Voice; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37277295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lightweight Deep Learning Model for Assessment of Substitution Voicing and Speech after Laryngeal Carcinoma Surgery.
Maskeliūnas R; Kulikajevas A; Damaševičius R; Pribuišis K; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Uloza V
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 35625971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voicing quantification is more relevant than period perturbation in substitution voices: an advanced acoustical study.
Dejonckere PH; Moerman MB; Martens JP; Schoentgen J; Manfredi C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1205-12. PubMed ID: 22218847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tridimensional assessment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia pre- and post-treatment with Botulinum toxin.
Dejonckere PH; Neumann KJ; Moerman MB; Martens JP; Giordano A; Manfredi C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1195-203. PubMed ID: 22210475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of Automated Voice Range Profiles, a Systematic Literature Review.
Printz T; Rosenberg T; Godballe C; Dyrvig AK; Grøntved ÅM
J Voice; 2018 May; 32(3):273-280. PubMed ID: 28647428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
Dejonckere P; Schoentgen J; Giordano A; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Manfredi C
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 21689056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
Ma EP; Yiu EM
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fundamental Frequency and Jitter Percent in MDVP and PRAAT.
Mohammed AA; Nagy A
J Voice; 2023 Jul; 37(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 33926765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
