584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21610020)
1. Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.
Aapro M; Cornes P; Abraham I
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 21610020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential cost savings from chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim and expanded access to targeted antineoplastic treatment across the European Union G5 countries: a simulation study.
Sun D; Andayani TM; Altyar A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
Clin Ther; 2015 Apr; 37(4):842-57. PubMed ID: 25704107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
McBride A; Campbell K; Bikkina M; MacDonald K; Abraham I; Balu S
J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 28722494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-efficiency analysis of conversion to biosimilar filgrastim for supportive cancer care and resultant expanded access analysis to supportive care and early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treatment in Saudi Arabia: simulation study.
Yousef CC; Khan MA; Almodaimegh H; Alshamrani M; Al-Foheidi M; AlAbdalkarim H; AlJedai A; Naeem A; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):394-402. PubMed ID: 36815700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biosimilar filgrastim treatment patterns and prevention of febrile neutropenia: a prospective multicentre study in France in patients with solid tumours (the ZOHé study).
Roché H; Eymard JC; Radji A; Prevost A; Diab R; Lamuraglia M; Soumoudronga RF; Gasnereau I; Toledano A
BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1127. PubMed ID: 30445935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment patterns and outcomes in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim (the MONITOR-GCSF study).
Gascón P; Aapro M; Ludwig H; Bokemeyer C; Boccadoro M; Turner M; Denhaerynck K; MacDonald K; Abraham I
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):911-925. PubMed ID: 26306517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin and docetaxel/paclitaxel with colony-stimulating growth factors: a comparison of filgrastim or lenograstim with pegfilgrastim.
Schippinger W; Holub R; Dandachi N; Bauernhofer T; Samonigg H
Oncology; 2006; 70(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16899982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zarzio®, biosimilar of filgrastim, in prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in routine practice: a French prospective multicentric study.
Nahon S; Rastkhah M; Ben Abdelghani M; Soumoudronga RF; Gasnereau I; Labourey JL
Support Care Cancer; 2016 May; 24(5):1991-1998. PubMed ID: 26507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: clinical and economic benefits.
Rader M
Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Apr; 20(5 Suppl 4):16-21. PubMed ID: 16736984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) in the management of neutropenia induced by anthracyclines and ifosfamide in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (NEUSAR).
Bongiovanni A; Monti M; Foca F; Recine F; Riva N; Di Iorio V; Liverani C; De Vita A; Miserocchi G; Mercatali L; Amadori D; Ibrahim T
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Jan; 25(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 27568305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. XM02, the first biosimilar G-CSF, is safe and effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with small cell or non-small cell lung cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
Gatzemeier U; Ciuleanu T; Dediu M; Ganea-Motan E; Lubenau H; Del Giglio A
J Thorac Oncol; 2009 Jun; 4(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 19404210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective review of the real-world experience of the Pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Lapelga®) to the reference biologic (Neulasta®).
Wong G; Zhang L; Majeed H; Razvi Y; DeAngelis C; Lam E; McKenzie E; Wang K; Pasetka M
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2022 Jan; 28(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 33215563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.
Skarlos DV; Timotheadou E; Galani E; Samantas E; Grimani I; Lianos E; Aravantinos G; Xanthakis I; Pentheroudakis G; Pectasides D; Fountzilas G
Oncology; 2009; 77(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19622901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]