141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21610291)
1. Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.
MacDonald LR; Harrison RL; Alessio AM; Hunter WC; Lewellen TK; Kinahan PE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3629-43. PubMed ID: 21610291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.
Macdonald LR; Schmitz RE; Alessio AM; Wollenweber SD; Stearns CW; Ganin A; Harrison RL; Lewellen TK; Kinahan PE
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(14):3723-38. PubMed ID: 18574308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo evaluation of hypothetical long axial field-of-view PET scanner using GE Discovery MI PET front-end architecture.
Tiwari A; Merrick M; Graves SA; Sunderland J
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1139-1152. PubMed ID: 34954831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of PET scanner designs using clinical metrics to optimize the scanner axial FOV and crystal thickness.
Surti S; Werner ME; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):3995-4012. PubMed ID: 23685783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Zein SA; Karakatsanis NA; Issa M; Haj-Ali AA; Nehmeh SA
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1949-1957. PubMed ID: 31985827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.
Poon JK; Dahlbom ML; Moses WW; Balakrishnan K; Wang W; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4077-94. PubMed ID: 22678106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical performance of adaptive axial FOV PET scanners with a sparse detector block rings or a checkerboard configuration.
Karakatsanis NA; Nehmeh MH; Conti M; Bal G; González AJ; Nehmeh SA
Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(10):. PubMed ID: 35472757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.
Schmitz RE; Harrison RL; Stearns CW; Lewellen TK; Kinahan PE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):935-44. PubMed ID: 17649907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion PET Modes of Acquisition for Limited-View Organ Scans.
Siman W; Kappadath SC
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Dec; 45(4):290-296. PubMed ID: 29042468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.
Spencer BA; Berg E; Schmall JP; Omidvari N; Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Tang S; Deng Z; Dong Y; Lv Y; Bao J; Liu W; Li H; Jones T; Badawi RD; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 33008932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.
Mawlawi O; Podoloff DA; Kohlmyer S; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Culp RF; Macapinlac H;
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1734-42. PubMed ID: 15471842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulation of sensitivity and NECR of an entire-body PET scanner.
Isnaini I; Obi T; Yoshida E; Yamaya T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jul; 7(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24366757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST.
Bettinardi V; Danna M; Savi A; Lecchi M; Castiglioni I; Gilardi MC; Bammer H; Lucignani G; Fazio F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 31(6):867-81. PubMed ID: 14770270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.
Zhang X; Badawi RD; Cherry SR; Qi J
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jun; 63(13):135010. PubMed ID: 29799814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo simulation of the system performance of a long axial field-of-view PET based on monolithic LYSO detectors.
Abi-Akl M; Dadgar M; Toufique Y; Bouhali O; Vandenberghe S
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Jun; 10(1):37. PubMed ID: 37311926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulating NEMA characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner-an economic total-body PET from plastic scintillators.
Moskal P; Kowalski P; Shopa RY; Raczyński L; Baran J; Chug N; Curceanu C; Czerwiński E; Dadgar M; Dulski K; Gajos A; Hiesmayr BC; Kacprzak K; Kapłon Ł; Kisielewska D; Klimaszewski K; Kopka P; Korcyl G; Krawczyk N; Krzemień W; Kubicz E; Niedźwiecki S; Parzych S; Raj J; Sharma S; Shivani S; Stępień E; Tayefi F; Wiślicki W
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(17):. PubMed ID: 34289460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Count-Rate Performance of the Discovery STE PET Scanner Using Partial Collimation.
Macdonald LR; Schmitz RE; Alessio AM; Wollenweber SD; Stearns CW; Ganin A; Harrison RL; Lewellen TK; Kinahan PE
IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997); 2006; 4():2488-2493. PubMed ID: 22072860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
