156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21611148)
1. Relative impacts of adult movement, larval dispersal and harvester movement on the effectiveness of reserve networks.
Grüss A; Kaplan DM; Hart DR
PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e19960. PubMed ID: 21611148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design.
Green AL; Maypa AP; Almany GR; Rhodes KL; Weeks R; Abesamis RA; Gleason MG; Mumby PJ; White AT
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Nov; 90(4):1215-47. PubMed ID: 25423947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting larval export from marine reserves.
Pelc RA; Warner RR; Gaines SD; Paris CB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18266-71. PubMed ID: 20181570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marine reserve networks for species that move within a home range.
Moffitt EA; Botsford LW; Kaplan DM; O'Farrell MR
Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1835-47. PubMed ID: 19831073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of dispersal patterns on marine reserves: does the tail wag the dog?
Lockwood DR; Hastings A; Botsford LW
Theor Popul Biol; 2002 May; 61(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 12027616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid effects of marine reserves via larval dispersal.
Cudney-Bueno R; Lavín MF; Marinone SG; Raimondi PT; Shaw WW
PLoS One; 2009; 4(1):e4140. PubMed ID: 19129910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are larvae of demersal fishes plankton or nekton?
Leis JM
Adv Mar Biol; 2006; 51():57-141. PubMed ID: 16905426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marine reserves stabilize fish populations and fisheries yields in disturbed coral reef systems.
Hopf JK; Jones GP; Williamson DH; Connolly SR
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jul; 29(5):e01905. PubMed ID: 30985954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming.
Álvarez-Romero JG; Munguía-Vega A; Beger M; Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros M; Suárez-Castillo AN; Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Gerber LR; Morzaria-Luna HN; Reyes-Bonilla H; Adams VM; Kolb M; Graham EM; VanDerWal J; Castillo-López A; Hinojosa-Arango G; Petatán-Ramírez D; Moreno-Baez M; Godínez-Reyes CR; Torre J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):e671-e691. PubMed ID: 29274104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating larval dispersal into MPA design for both conservation and fisheries.
Krueck NC; Ahmadia GN; Green A; Jones GP; Possingham HP; Riginos C; Treml EA; Mumby PJ
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):925-941. PubMed ID: 28039952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marine Reserve Targets to Sustain and Rebuild Unregulated Fisheries.
Krueck NC; Ahmadia GN; Possingham HP; Riginos C; Treml EA; Mumby PJ
PLoS Biol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):e2000537. PubMed ID: 28056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Larval export from marine reserves and the recruitment benefit for fish and fisheries.
Harrison HB; Williamson DH; Evans RD; Almany GR; Thorrold SR; Russ GR; Feldheim KA; van Herwerden L; Planes S; Srinivasan M; Berumen ML; Jones GP
Curr Biol; 2012 Jun; 22(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 22633811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marine reserve design theory for species with ontogenetic migration.
White JW
Biol Lett; 2015 Jan; 11(1):20140511. PubMed ID: 25631225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dispersal per recruit: an efficient method for assessing sustainability in marine reserve networks.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2006 Dec; 16(6):2248-63. PubMed ID: 17205902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling the impacts of two age-related portfolio effects on recruitment variability with and without a marine reserve.
McGilliard CR; Punt AE; Hilborn R; Essington T
Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):1985-2000. PubMed ID: 28667790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Chollett I; Krueck N; Holstein D; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14008. PubMed ID: 36178033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A connectivity portfolio effect stabilizes marine reserve performance.
Harrison HB; Bode M; Williamson DH; Berumen ML; Jones GP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(41):25595-25600. PubMed ID: 32989139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When is spillover from marine reserves likely to benefit fisheries?
Buxton CD; Hartmann K; Kearney R; Gardner C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107032. PubMed ID: 25188380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The good, the bad and the ugly of marine reserves for fishery yields.
De Leo GA; Micheli F
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 370(1681):. PubMed ID: 26460129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
