336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21613027)
1. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A three-appointment alternative treatment protocol for fabricating an implant-supported milled bar overdenture.
Lin WS; Ozdemir E; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 22304740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
Vogel RE
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
Payne JA; Pereira BP
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A screw-connected sectional impression tray for patient with limited opening.
Paprocki GJ; Karunagaran S; Jain V
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 24360014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
