These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21613027)

  • 21. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
    Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hydraulic implant abutment level impressions.
    Hoos JC; Kaplowitz GJ
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Sep; 120(9):888-9. PubMed ID: 14560463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of a self-perforating impression tray for dental implants.
    Marotti J; Tortamano P; Castilho TR; Steagall W; Wolfart S; Haselhuhn K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):843-8. PubMed ID: 24787129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):658-62. PubMed ID: 24836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tray modification for making impressions of mobile teeth.
    Çomut AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):341-2. PubMed ID: 23684286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Management of excessive movable tissue: a modified impression technique.
    Shum MH; Pow EH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 24461949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A modified indirect working die technique for fabricating provisional restorations for multiple teeth.
    Antonelli JR; Gulker I
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):392-6. PubMed ID: 11203955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impression technique for ovate pontics.
    de Vasconcellos DK; Volpato CÂ; Zani IM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
    Raviv E; Hanna J; Raviv R; Harel-Raviv M
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.