These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21613034)

  • 1. Cemented or screw-retained implant restorations: how do you decide?
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21613034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
    Shadid R; Sadaqa N
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Zandinejad A; Martin WC; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 24360007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of 209 all-ceramic single crowns cemented on natural and implant-supported abutments with different luting agents: a 6-year retrospective study.
    Sorrentino R; Galasso L; Tetè S; De Simone G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 20030675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
    Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of framework design on fracture resistance of metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
    de Oliveira JL; Martins LM; Sanada J; de Oliveira PC; do Valle AL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 20617225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
    Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrievable cemented crown options on implant-supported angled abutments: a case report.
    Ganor Y; Indig B; Gross M
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):679-84. PubMed ID: 9180404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant-supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications.
    Schwarz S; Schröder C; Corcodel N; Hassel AJ; Rammelsberg P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e151-8. PubMed ID: 22081988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns.
    Schwedhelm ER; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12589295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Esthetic evaluation of materials used to fill access holes of screw-retained implant crowns.
    Weininger B; McGlumphy E; Beck M
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 18616076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate load and esthetic zone considerations to replace maxillary incisor teeth using a new zirconia implant abutment in the bone grafted anterior maxilla.
    Lee CY; Hasegawa H
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 19170292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An esthetic technique to fill screw-retained fixed prostheses.
    Taylor RC; Ghoneim AS; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(6):384-5. PubMed ID: 15641458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.