These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21613040)

  • 1. Cutting effectiveness of carbide burs following multiple steam autoclaving cycles.
    Spranley TJ; Cheramie TJ; Ireland EJ; Sergent RS; Yeadon WR; Desonier DP; Raymond WD; Hagen JL
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 21613040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of cutting instruments on permeability and morphology of the dentin surface.
    Sekimoto T; Derkson GD; Richardson AS
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 10530274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the cutting efficiency and working life of carbide burs.
    Di Cristofaro RG; Giner L; Mayoral JR
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 23387508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing cutting efficiencies of diamond burs using a high-speed electric handpiece.
    Chung EM; Sung EC; Wu B; Caputo AA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16903197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of various grit burs on marginal integrity of resin composite restorations.
    Nishimura K; Ikeda M; Yoshikawa T; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Mar; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15868736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cutting effectiveness of diamond instruments subjected to cyclic sterilization methods.
    Gureckis KM; Burgess JO; Schwartz RS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 1666657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A microbiological assessment of polymer and conventional carbide burs in caries removal.
    Isik EE; Olmez A; Akca G; Sultan N
    Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 20836951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the cutting efficiency of different burs on zirconia substrate.
    Peters OA; Du D; Ho MY; Chu R; Moule A
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 30983118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Scanning electron microscopy study of the effect of steel and tungsten carbide burs on dental tissues].
    Comte AL
    J Biol Buccale; 1983 Mar; 11(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 6574129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of bur blade concentricity on high-speed tooth-cutting interactions: a video-rate confocal microscopic study.
    Watson TF; Cook RJ
    J Dent Res; 1995 Nov; 74(11):1749-55. PubMed ID: 8530736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mystery of the separating tungsten carbide burs.
    Lim KC
    Singapore Dent J; 1988 Dec; 13(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 3155335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The magnitude of cutting forces at high speed.
    Elias K; Amis AA; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 12644805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cutting effectiveness of carbide fissure burs on teeth.
    Luebke NH; Chan KC; Bramson JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Jan; 43(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 6927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High and low torque handpieces: cutting dynamics, enamel cracking and tooth temperature.
    Watson TF; Flanagan D; Stone DG
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jun; 188(12):680-6. PubMed ID: 11022384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficiency testing 330 carbide dental burs utilizing Macor substrate.
    Wilwerding T; Aiello A
    Pediatr Dent; 1990; 12(3):170-1. PubMed ID: 2077493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.