394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21613951)
1. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture.
Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N
Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
Manju V; Sreelal T
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
