146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21614031)
41. Notice of retraction: final resolution.
Sox HC
Ann Intern Med; 2005 May; 142(9):798. PubMed ID: 15845952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The long road to retraction.
Nat Med; 2003 Sep; 9(9):1093. PubMed ID: 12949503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Response to Horrom TA. The perils of copy and paste: plagiarism in scientific publishing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):vii-xii.
Wiwanitkit V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(1):xiii. PubMed ID: 23516090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?].
Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.
Anekwe TD
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. What do duplicate publications; self-plagiarism and the monotony of endless descriptive studies signify: publication pressures or simply a collective lack of imagination?
O'Connor SJ
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 20525059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Plagiarism in scientific publications].
Reyes B H
Rev Med Chil; 2009 Jan; 137(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19399315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A major failure of scientific governance.
Smith R; Godlee F
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5694. PubMed ID: 26514391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Plagiarism.
Manogue M; Rohlin M; Baum B; Winning T;
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Nov; 13(4):189. PubMed ID: 19824953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Data fabrication and article retraction: how not to get lost in the woods.
Eisenach JC
Anesthesiology; 2009 May; 110(5):955-6. PubMed ID: 19262370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Notice of retraction: final resolution.
Poehlman ET
Ann Intern Med; 2005 May; 142(9):798. PubMed ID: 15845951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [My explanation concerning the situation regarding articles identified as plagiarism].
Jendryczko A
Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):103-4. PubMed ID: 9644028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The Scott Reuben saga: one last retraction.
White PF; Rosow CE; Shafer SL;
Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 21350225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [In certain publications, the main author, A. Jendryczko is suspected of plagiarism].
Drózdz M
Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):100. PubMed ID: 9644025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
