139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21614295)
21. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Increased Uniformity in Diagnostic Accuracy of Pigmented Lesions Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Information.
Litchman G; Teplitz R; Svoboda RM; Del Rosso JQ
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 2021 Oct; 14(10):35-36. PubMed ID: 34976288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast cancer detection based on multi-frequency EIS measurement.
Cheng Z; Xiuzhen D; Feng F; Zhenyu J; Canhua X
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4158-60. PubMed ID: 18002918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of electrical impedance spectroscopy to detect malignant and potentially malignant oral lesions.
Murdoch C; Brown BH; Hearnden V; Speight PM; D'Apice K; Hegarty AM; Tidy JA; Healey TJ; Highfield PE; Thornhill MH
Int J Nanomedicine; 2014; 9():4521-32. PubMed ID: 25285005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the breast: clinical imaging results in 26 subjects.
Kerner TE; Paulsen KD; Hartov A; Soho SK; Poplack SP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12166860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of electrical impedance spectroscopy as an adjunct to dermoscopy in short-term monitoring of atypical melanocytic lesions.
Ceder H; Hylén AS; Larkö AW; Paoli J
Dermatol Pract Concept; 2016 Oct; 6(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 27867738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.
Daglar G; Senol K; Yakut ZI; Yuksek YN; Tutuncu T; Tez M; Yesiltepe CH
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(9):505-510. PubMed ID: 27677193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroid surgery: a prospective study.
Stojadinovic A; Fields SI; Shriver CD; Lenington S; Ginor R; Peoples GE; Burch HB; Peretz T; Freund HR; Nissan A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15827796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Electrical impedance scanning: a new approach to skin cancer diagnosis.
Glickman YA; Filo O; David M; Yayon A; Topaz M; Zamir B; Ginzburg A; Rozenman D; Kenan G
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Aug; 9(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 12877689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Detection and classification of different liver lesions: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinical single centre investigation.
Böttcher J; Hansch A; Pfeil A; Schmidt P; Malich A; Schneeweiss A; Maurer MH; Streitparth F; Teichgräber UK; Renz DM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1860-9. PubMed ID: 23932636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Classification of thyroid nodules using a resonance-frequency-based electrical impedance spectroscopy: a preliminary assessment.
Zheng B; Tublin ME; Klym AH; Gur D
Thyroid; 2013 Jul; 23(7):854-62. PubMed ID: 23259723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Imamura T; Isomoto I; Sueyoshi E; Yano H; Uga T; Abe K; Hayashi T; Honda S; Yamaguchi T; Uetani M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to improve accuracy of the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Ma D; Lu F; Zou X; Zhang H; Li Y; Zhang L; Chen L; Qin D; Wang B
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():175-179. PubMed ID: 27742437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Mishra V; Bouayad H; Schned A; Heaney J; Halter RJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():3258-61. PubMed ID: 23366621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cancer Detection Based on Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy: A Clinical Study.
Moqadam SM; Grewal PK; Haeri Z; Ingledew PA; Kohli K; Golnaraghi F
J Electr Bioimpedance; 2018 Jan; 9(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 33584916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving suspicious breast lesion characterization using semi-automatic lesion fractional volume washout kinetic analysis.
Huang J; Hahn T; Hoisington L; Schafer S; Zong X; Berger K
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):5998-6009. PubMed ID: 22047364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A GMM-based breast cancer risk stratification using a resonance-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy.
Lederman D; Zheng B; Wang X; Sumkin JH; Gur D
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1649-59. PubMed ID: 21520878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Coronary Artery Disease and Inflammatory Activation Interfere with Peripheral Tissue Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Characteristics-Initial Report.
Urbanowicz T; Michalak M; Marzec E; Komosa A; Filipiak KJ; Olasińska-Wiśniewska A; Witkowska A; Rodzki M; Tykarski A; Jemielity M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36768108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
