These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21614322)

  • 1. Radiographic viewing conditions at Johannesburg Hospital.
    Nyathi T; Mwale A; Segone P; Mhlanga Sh; Pule M
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2008 Apr; 4(2):e17. PubMed ID: 21614322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viewing conditions for diagnostic images in three major Dublin hospitals: a comparison with WHO and CEC recommendations.
    McCarthy E; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 76(902):94-7. PubMed ID: 12642276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions.
    Pollard BJ; Chawla AS; Delong DM; Hashimoto N; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2204-13. PubMed ID: 18649449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.
    Kimme-Smith C; Haus AG; DeBruhl N; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 9057533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting.
    Wade C; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):465-71. PubMed ID: 15151966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of monitor specification and viewing conditions in breast screening units in the North West of England.
    Papathanasiou S; Thompson JD; Walton LA
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):546-553. PubMed ID: 33288395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viewing boxes: a survey in diagnostic radiology departments of Moroccan hospitals.
    Bentayeb F; Nfaoiu K; Basraoui O; Azevedo AC
    Phys Med; 2010 Oct; 26(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 20036176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic review of viewing conditions and monitor specifications in mammography.
    Papathanasiou S; Walton LA; Thompson JD
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):325-331. PubMed ID: 32305425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The assessment and characterization of the built-in internal photometer of primary diagnostic monitors.
    Ruuge AE; Mahmood UA; Erdi YE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 28300388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance characteristics and quality assurance considerations for displays used in interventional radiology and cardiac catheterization facilities.
    Silosky MS; Marsh RM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):708-717. PubMed ID: 30091189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality assurance measures within DIN 6856: the adaptation of film viewing boxes and their specifications in the radiology department of a university hospital. Deutsche Industrie-Norm].
    Kirchner J; Kollath J
    Rofo; 1996 Feb; 164(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 8679977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
    Jung H; Kim HJ; Kang WS; Yoo SK; Fujioka K; Hasegawa M; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2155-64. PubMed ID: 15305470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of ambient light variations on luminance ratio of CRT monitor and image contrast in ultrasonography.
    Hatanaka S; Morishita J; Chishaki A; Noguchi Y; Hokazono E; Komiya Y; Higashida Y; Shimanoe Y; Nakamura K; Tashiro H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Nov; 65(11):1512-8. PubMed ID: 20019431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of the Actiwatch and Clouclip for measuring illumination in real-world conditions.
    Howell CM; McCullough SJ; Doyle L; Murphy MH; Saunders KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1048-1059. PubMed ID: 34387902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments.
    Chawla AS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 17278493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast screen new South wales generally demonstrates good radiologic viewing conditions.
    Soh BP; Lee W; Diffey JL; McEntee MF; Kench PL; Reed WM; Brennan PC
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):759-67. PubMed ID: 23319112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Different Viewing Conditions on Radiographic Interpretation.
    Moshfeghi M; Shahbazian M; Sajadi SS; Sajadi S; Ansari H
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Nov; 12(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 27507997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.
    Uffmann M; Prokop M; Kupper W; Mang T; Fiedler V; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Mar; 40(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 15714093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.