These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21615658)

  • 61. Financial $ide Effects: why patients should be informed of costs.
    Hall A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(3):41-7. PubMed ID: 24700538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Genetic testing without consent: the implications of the new Human Tissue Act 2004.
    Lucassen A; Kaye J
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 32(12):690-2. PubMed ID: 17145906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
    Appelbaum PS; Fyer A; Klitzman RL; Martinez J; Parens E; Zhang Y; Chung WK
    Genet Med; 2015 Aug; 17(8):644-50. PubMed ID: 25503499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Patient Consent: Defining Control of Genetic Information.
    Jenks S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Aug; 109(8):. PubMed ID: 29117393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Reasonable expectations of privacy in non-disclosure of familial genetic risk: What is it reasonable to expect?
    Chico V
    Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):308-315. PubMed ID: 30521983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics.
    Rigter T; Henneman L; Kristoffersson U; Hall A; Yntema HG; Borry P; Tönnies H; Waisfisz Q; Elting MW; Dondorp WJ; Cornel MC
    Hum Mutat; 2013 Oct; 34(10):1322-8. PubMed ID: 23784691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Disclosing genetic information to family members without consent: Five Australian case studies.
    Tiller J; Bilkey G; Macintosh R; O'Sullivan S; Groube S; Palover M; Pachter N; Rothstein M; Lacaze P; Otlowski M
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Nov; 63(11):104035. PubMed ID: 32805446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Myth or Magic? Towards a Revised Theory of Informed Consent in Medical Research.
    Heinrichs B
    J Med Philos; 2019 Jan; 44(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 30649452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Informed consent in clinical research.
    Pick A; Berry S; Gilbert K; McCaul J
    Nurs Stand; 2013 Aug 7-13; 27(49):44-7. PubMed ID: 23924136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Fee disclosure at a cost.
    Fins JJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(6):3. PubMed ID: 25412966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use.
    Godard B; Hurlimann T; Letendre M; Egalité N;
    Fam Cancer; 2006; 5(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 16528614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Who are you going to call? Primary care patients' disclosure decisions regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
    Wasson K; Cherny S; Sanders TN; Hogan NS; Helzlsouer KJ
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2014; 4(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 24748260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A review of recorded information given to patients starting to take clozapine and the development of guidelines on disclosure, a key component of informed consent.
    Parsons B; Kennedy M
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Oct; 33(10):564-7. PubMed ID: 17906051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Are guidelines for genetic testing of children necessary?
    Fenwick A
    Fam Cancer; 2010 Mar; 9(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 19685282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Familial communication of research results: a need to know?
    Black L; McClellan KA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):605-13. PubMed ID: 22084846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [The comeback of paternalism?].
    Perrier A
    Rev Med Suisse; 2015 Oct; 11(490):1875-6. PubMed ID: 26665655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Open Questions.
    Kaebnick GE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):2. PubMed ID: 26786031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The author replies.
    Hall A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(6):4. PubMed ID: 25412967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.
    Samuel GN; Dheensa S; Farsides B; Fenwick A; Lucassen A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 28789658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. PanCAN PALS--patient and liaison services: an innovative model for informed patient decision-making, including patient information and clinical trials.
    Kim P; Fleshman J; Muething M; Smith ML; Spangler S; Zieger J; Siegel A; Comis RL
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2003 Feb; 17(2 Suppl 2):16-7. PubMed ID: 12632873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.