188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21618336)
1. An analysis algorithm for accurate determination of articular cartilage thickness of hip joint from MR images.
Cheng Y; Jin Q; Zhao J; Guo C; Bai J; Tamura S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jul; 34(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 21618336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hip cartilage thickness measurement accuracy improvement.
Cheng Y; Wang S; Yamazaki T; Zhao J; Nakajima Y; Tamura S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Dec; 31(8):643-55. PubMed ID: 17904821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy limits for the thickness measurement of the hip joint cartilage in 3-D MR images: simulation and validation.
Cheng Y; Guo C; Wang Y; Bai J; Tamura S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Feb; 60(2):517-33. PubMed ID: 23204268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the articular cartilage from MR images using directional gradient vector flow snakes.
Tang J; Millington S; Acton ST; Crandall J; Hurwitz S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):896-907. PubMed ID: 16686412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human hip joint cartilage: MRI quantitative thickness and volume measurements discriminating acetabulum and femoral head.
Li W; Abram F; Beaudoin G; Berthiaume MJ; Pelletier JP; Martel-Pelletier J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Dec; 55(12):2731-40. PubMed ID: 19126452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The magnetic resonance tomographic optimization of hip joint cartilage visualization by the selection of a T1-volume gradient-echo sequence and the use of hip-joint traction].
Rosenberg R; Bernd L; Wrazidlo W; Lederer W; Schneider S
Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 7579219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone.
Williams TG; Holmes AP; Waterton JC; Maciewicz RA; Hutchinson CE; Moots RJ; Nash AF; Taylor CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1541-59. PubMed ID: 20378463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Determination of cartilage thickness in the ankle joint. an MRT (1.5)-anatomical comparative study].
Trattnig S; Breitenseher MJ; Huber M; Zettl R; Rottmann B; Haller J; Imhof H
Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 9198493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility and reproducibility of relaxometry, morphometric, and geometrical measurements of the hip joint with magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Carballido-Gamio J; Link TM; Li X; Han ET; Krug R; Ries MD; Majumdar S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):227-35. PubMed ID: 18581346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotibial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction.
Pilch L; Stewart C; Gordon D; Inman R; Parsons K; Pataki I; Stevens J
J Rheumatol; 1994 Dec; 21(12):2307-21. PubMed ID: 7699634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging.
Mintz DN; Hooper T; Connell D; Buly R; Padgett DE; Potter HG
Arthroscopy; 2005 Apr; 21(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 15800516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.
Eckstein F; Schnier M; Haubner M; Priebsch J; Glaser C; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):137-48. PubMed ID: 9678042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional distribution of acetabular cartilage thickness in patients with hip dysplasia: a fully automated computational analysis of MR imaging.
Nishii T; Sugano N; Sato Y; Tanaka H; Miki H; Yoshikawa H
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2004 Aug; 12(8):650-7. PubMed ID: 15262245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with hip cartilage volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging: the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort Study.
Zhai G; Cicuttini F; Srikanth V; Cooley H; Ding C; Jones G
Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Apr; 52(4):1069-76. PubMed ID: 15818695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging.
El-Khoury GY; Alliman KJ; Lundberg HJ; Rudert MJ; Brown TD; Saltzman CL
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):768-73. PubMed ID: 15516604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.
Abraham CL; Bangerter NK; McGavin LS; Peters CL; Drew AJ; Hanrahan CJ; Anderson AE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1329-38. PubMed ID: 25851109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of dGEMRIC in assessment of hip joint cartilage: a prospective study.
Bittersohl B; Hosalkar HS; Haamberg T; Kim YJ; Werlen S; Siebenrock KA; Mamisch TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 19557744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patellar cartilage lesions: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and T2 relaxation-time mapping.
Hannila I; Nieminen MT; Rauvala E; Tervonen O; Ojala R
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 17453527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of acetabular labral tears, repair and resection on hip cartilage strain: A 7T MR study.
Greaves LL; Gilbart MK; Yung AC; Kozlowski P; Wilson DR
J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):858-63. PubMed ID: 20015494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A technique for visualization and mapping of local cartilage thickness changes in MR images of osteoarthritic knee.
Ge Q; Cheng Y; Bi K; Guo C; Bai J; Tamura S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3404-11. PubMed ID: 22571929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
