73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21618600)
21. Summary report: Missing data and pedigree and genotyping errors.
Badzioch MD; Thomas DC; Jarvik GP
Genet Epidemiol; 2003; 25 Suppl 1():S36-42. PubMed ID: 14635167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A unification of multivariate methods for meta-analysis of genetic association studies.
Bagos PG
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article31. PubMed ID: 18976227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Parametric model-based statistics for possible genotyping errors and sample stratification in sibling-pair SNP data.
Korostishevsky M; Malkin I; Spector T; Livshits G
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19455577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Statistical validity for testing associations between genetic markers and quantitative traits in family data.
Nick TG; George V; Elston RC; Wilson AF
Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 7607415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Uncovering the total heritability explained by all true susceptibility variants in a genome-wide association study.
So HC; Li M; Sham PC
Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 35(6):447-56. PubMed ID: 21618601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A novel method to identify gene-gene effects in nuclear families: the MDR-PDT.
Martin ER; Ritchie MD; Hahn L; Kang S; Moore JH
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 16374833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adapting the logical basis of tests for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium to the real needs of association studies in human and medical genetics.
Goddard KA; Ziegler A; Wellek S
Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):569-80. PubMed ID: 19235187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combining unrelated family studies to improve the power of genetic association test.
Cheng KF
Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):311-25. PubMed ID: 18991259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reconstructing parental genotypes when testing for linkage in the presence of association.
Knapp M
Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 11855948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A general population-genetic model for the production by population structure of spurious genotype-phenotype associations in discrete, admixed or spatially distributed populations.
Rosenberg NA; Nordborg M
Genetics; 2006 Jul; 173(3):1665-78. PubMed ID: 16582435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Population identification using genetic data.
Lawson DJ; Falush D
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2012; 13():337-61. PubMed ID: 22703172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An analytical comparison of the principal component method and the mixed effects model for association studies in the presence of cryptic relatedness and population stratification.
Wang K; Hu X; Peng Y
Hum Hered; 2013; 76(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23921716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Logistic regression protects against population structure in genetic association studies.
Setakis E; Stirnadel H; Balding DJ
Genome Res; 2006 Feb; 16(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 16354752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mixed logistic regression in genome-wide association studies.
Milet J; Courtin D; Garcia A; Perdry H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):536. PubMed ID: 33228527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accounting for relatedness in family based genetic association studies.
McArdle PF; O'Connell JR; Pollin TI; Baumgarten M; Shuldiner AR; Peyser PA; Mitchell BD
Hum Hered; 2007; 64(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 17570925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The largest strongly connected component in the cyclical pedigree model of Wakeley et al.
Blath J; Kadow S; Ortgiese M
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Dec; 98():28-37. PubMed ID: 25453605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computation of ancestry scores with mixed families and unrelated individuals.
Zhou YH; Marron JS; Wright FA
Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 28452052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of population stratification on population-based marker-disease association analysis.
Li T; Li Z; Ying Z; Zhang H
Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Jul; 74(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 20529080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in case-control association studies of admixed populations.
Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 15185399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of genome-wide association methods in analyses of admixed populations with complex familial relationships.
Kadri NK; Guldbrandtsen B; Sørensen P; Sahana G
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e88926. PubMed ID: 24662750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
