132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2161864)
1. Presumptive identification of enteroviruses with RD, HEp-2, and RMK cell lines.
Johnston SL; Siegel CS
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 May; 28(5):1049-50. PubMed ID: 2161864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of human enteroviruses among apparently healthy nursery school children in Accra.
Attoh J; Obodai E; Adiku T; Odoom JK
Pan Afr Med J; 2014; 18():66. PubMed ID: 25400833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Lim Benyesh-Melnick antiserum pools for serotyping human enterovirus cell culture isolates--still useful, but may fail to identify current strains of echovirus 18.
Bendig J; Earl P
J Virol Methods; 2005 Jul; 127(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 15893571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of porcine enteroviruses by antigenic analysis and cytopathic effects in tissue culture: description of 3 new serotypes.
Knowles NJ; Buckley LS; Pereira HG
Arch Virol; 1979; 62(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 229804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel approach to enterovirus typing.
Lee SH; Boulilier JE; MacDonald MA; Forward KR
J Med Virol; 1991 Oct; 35(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 1662704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enterovirus infections with special reference to enterovirus 71.
Hsiung GD; Wang JR
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2000 Mar; 33(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10806956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of monoclonal antibodies to identify serotypes of enterovirus isolates.
Rigonan AS; Mann L; Chonmaitree T
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jul; 36(7):1877-81. PubMed ID: 9650928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of rhabdomyosarcoma and guinea pig embryo cell cultures to field isolates of difficult-to-cultivate group A coxsackieviruses.
Lipson SM; Walderman R; Costello P; Szabo K
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jul; 26(7):1298-303. PubMed ID: 2842370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A combination of four cell types for rapid detection of enteroviruses in clinical specimens.
Dagan R; Menegus MA
J Med Virol; 1986 Jul; 19(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 3016165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Sensitivities of various cell cultures for the isolation of enteroviruses].
Ozkaya E; Korukluoğlu G; Yalçinkaya T; Türkeri A; Atak T; Kubar A
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002; 36(3-4):301-8. PubMed ID: 12838664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of enterovirus immune horse serum pools for identification of virus field strains.
Schmidt NJ; Melnick JL; Wenner HA; Ho HH; Burkhardt MA
Bull World Health Organ; 1971; 45(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 4335411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility of the VERO line of African green monkey kidney cells to human enteroviruses.
Davis PM; Phillpotts RJ
J Hyg (Lond); 1974 Feb; 72(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 4361500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of multiple shell vial cell lines for isolation of enteroviruses: a national perspective.
She RC; Crist G; Billetdeaux E; Langer J; Petti CA
J Clin Virol; 2006 Nov; 37(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 16884950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine enterovirus diagnosis in a human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line.
Bell EJ; Cosgrove BP
Bull World Health Organ; 1980; 58(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 6251982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. L20B cells simplify culture of polioviruses from clinical samples.
Wood DJ; Hull B
J Med Virol; 1999 Jun; 58(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 10335869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-polio enteroviruses serotypes circulating in Nigeria.
Oyero OG; Adu FD
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Dec; 39 Suppl():201-8. PubMed ID: 22416664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enteroviruses in sludge: multiyear experience with four wastewater treatment plants.
Hamparian VV; Ottolenghi AC; Hughes JH
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 50(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 2996422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enterovirus isolation from children with acute respiratory infections and presumptive identification by a modified microplate method.
Mizuta K; Abiko C; Goto H; Murata T; Murayama S
Int J Infect Dis; 2003 Jun; 7(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 12839716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of rhabdomyosarcoma, buffalo green monkey kidney epithelial, A549 (human lung epithelial) cells and human embryonic lung fibroblasts for isolation of enteroviruses from clinical samples.
Kok TW; Pryor T; Payne L
J Clin Virol; 1998 Jul; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9784144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the susceptibility of three human gut tumour-derived differentiated epithelial cell lines, primary monkey kidney cells and human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line to 66-prototype strains of human enteroviruses.
Patel JR; Daniel J; Mathan VI
J Virol Methods; 1985 Dec; 12(3-4):209-16. PubMed ID: 3009511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
