197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21618665)
1. Oscillatory correlates of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff in a response-conflict task.
Pastötter B; Berchtold F; Bäuml KH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Aug; 33(8):1834-49. PubMed ID: 21618665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflict processing in the anterior cingulate cortex constrains response priming.
Pastötter B; Hanslmayr S; Bäuml KH
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1599-605. PubMed ID: 20123025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two Independent Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations during Conflict Detection and Adaptation in a Simon-Type Manual Reaching Task.
Töllner T; Wang Y; Makeig S; Müller HJ; Jung TP; Gramann K
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2504-2515. PubMed ID: 28137968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff.
Bogacz R; Wagenmakers EJ; Forstmann BU; Nieuwenhuis S
Trends Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 33(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 19819033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.
Derosiere G; Klein PA; Nozaradan S; Zénon A; Mouraux A; Duque J
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9486-9504. PubMed ID: 30201772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissociating response conflict and error likelihood in anterior cingulate cortex.
Yeung N; Nieuwenhuis S
J Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 29(46):14506-10. PubMed ID: 19923284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the locus of the effect of alerting on response conflict: An event-related EEG study with a speed-accuracy tradeoff manipulation.
Asanowicz D; Wołoszyn K; Panek B; Wronka E
Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():62-75. PubMed ID: 31004720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alcohol Hits You When It Is Hard: Intoxication, Task Difficulty, and Theta Brain Oscillations.
Rosen BQ; Padovan N; Marinkovic K
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Apr; 40(4):743-52. PubMed ID: 27012442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amygdaloid theta-band power increases during conflict processing in humans.
Tang AM; Chen KH; Gogia AS; Del Campo-Vera RM; Sebastian R; Gilbert ZD; Lee Y; Nune G; Liu CY; Kellis S; Lee B
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 91():183-192. PubMed ID: 34373025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emotion triggers executive attention: anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala responses to emotional words in a conflict task.
Kanske P; Kotz SA
Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Feb; 32(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 20715084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trial-to-trial adjustments of speed-accuracy trade-offs in premotor and primary motor cortex.
Thura D; Guberman G; Cisek P
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Feb; 117(2):665-683. PubMed ID: 27852735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff.
Ho T; Brown S; van Maanen L; Forstmann BU; Wagenmakers EJ; Serences JT
J Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 32(23):7992-8003. PubMed ID: 22674274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. It's the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict.
Pastötter B; Frings C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 30(7):985-998. PubMed ID: 29668394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic adjustments of cognitive control: oscillatory correlates of the conflict adaptation effect.
Pastötter B; Dreisbach G; Bäuml KH
J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 25(12):2167-78. PubMed ID: 24001006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff.
Penconek M
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21995. PubMed ID: 36539428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When the brain changes its mind: Oscillatory dynamics of conflict processing and response switching in a flanker task during alcohol challenge.
Beaton LE; Azma S; Marinkovic K
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191200. PubMed ID: 29329355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Target Amplification and Distractor Inhibition: Theta Oscillatory Dynamics of Selective Attention in a Flanker Task.
Haciahmet CC; Frings C; Pastötter B
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 21(2):355-371. PubMed ID: 33721227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stroop N450 reflects both stimulus conflict and response conflict.
Huang B; Chen C
Neuroreport; 2020 Aug; 31(12):851-856. PubMed ID: 32453024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.
Kieffaber PD; Kruschke JK; Cho RY; Walker PM; Hetrick WP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):700-19. PubMed ID: 22984990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
