133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21619404)
1. Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine.
Zhou ZJ; Zhao FD; Fang XQ; Zhao X; Fan SW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Sep; 15(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 21619404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion.
Berg S; Fritzell P; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):987-94. PubMed ID: 19819762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
Robaina-Padrón FJ
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study.
Ekman P; Möller H; Hedlund R
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 15653083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.
Videbaek TS; Christensen FB; Soegaard R; Hansen ES; Høy K; Helmig P; Niedermann B; Eiskjoer SP; Bünger CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2875-80. PubMed ID: 17139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain.
Soegaard R; Christensen FB; Christiansen T; Bünger C
Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 16871387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Meta-analysis of lumbar posterolateral fusion versus circumferential fusion in the treatment of the lumbar disease].
Cui C; Zhu Y; Han XX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 47(18):1374-8. PubMed ID: 20092769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain.
Soegaard R; Bünger CE; Christiansen T; Høy K; Eiskjaer SP; Christensen FB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2405-14. PubMed ID: 18090078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-analysis of circumferential fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine.
Han X; Zhu Y; Cui C; Wu Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):E618-25. PubMed ID: 19644321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion.
Min JH; Jang JS; Jung Bj; Lee HY; Choi WC; Shim CS; Choi G; Lee SH
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):305-9. PubMed ID: 18600137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is one cage enough in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of unilateral single cage interbody fusion to bilateral cages.
Fogel GR; Toohey JS; Neidre A; Brantigan JW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 17285054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.
Long H; Kazunasa U; Liu S; Akio S; Taito I
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 21(11):1155-9. PubMed ID: 18069464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Surgical treatment for lumbar discogenic low back pain].
Wang XY; Hu ZH; Hu JZ; Li KH; Zhang HQ
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Aug; 31(4):607-9, 612. PubMed ID: 16951531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF stand-alone) for chronic low back pain].
Rubin G; Raichel M; Tanzman M; Rozen N
Harefuah; 2009 Jun; 148(6):367-9, 413, 412. PubMed ID: 19902599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes and fusion success at 2 years of single-level instrumented posterolateral fusions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix versus iliac crest bone graft.
Dimar JR; Glassman SD; Burkus KJ; Carreon LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):2534-9; discussion 2540. PubMed ID: 17047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.
Fritzell P; Hägg O; Nordwall A;
Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):178-89. PubMed ID: 12709856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
