1028 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21620926)
1. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A
J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strengthening effect of horizontally placed fiberglass posts in endodontically-treated teeth restored with direct resin composite.
Favero FJ; De Melo TA; Stona D; Mota EG; Spohr AM; Burnett LH
Am J Dent; 2015 Jun; 28(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 26201225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems.
Taha DG; Abdel-Samad AA; Mahmoud SH
Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21716986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sorrentino R; Salameh Z; Zarone F; Tay FR; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 17432401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro fracture resistance of root-filled teeth using new-generation dentine bonding adhesives.
Hürmüzlü F; Serper A; Siso SH; Er K
Int Endod J; 2003 Nov; 36(11):770-3. PubMed ID: 14641441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
