1028 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21620926)
21. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
Sagsen B; Aslan B
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root-filled teeth restored with direct resin composite restorations under static and fatigue loading.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 23848066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with carbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, and an experimental dentin post system: an in vitro study.
Ambica K; Mahendran K; Talwar S; Verma M; Padmini G; Periasamy R
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 23228265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
Solomon CS; Osman YI
SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
Hofmann N; Just N; Haller B; Hugo B; Klaiber B
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of mechanical loading on the cusp defection of premolars restored with direct and indirect techniques.
Zamboni SC; Nogueira L; Bottino MA; Sobrinho LC; Valandro LF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24939269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations.
Geiger S; Paikin L; Gorfil C; Gordon M
Quintessence Int; 2008 Feb; 39(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 18560642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
Salaverry A; Borges GA; Mota EG; Burnett Júnior LH; Spohr AM
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material.
Fráter M; Forster A; Keresztúri M; Braunitzer G; Nagy K
J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of filling materials on the bonding interface of thin-walled roots reinforced with resin and quartz fiber posts.
Manicardi CA; Versiani MA; Saquy PC; Pécora JD; de Sousa-Neto MD
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 21419304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of dentinal tubules and resin-based endodontic sealers on fracture properties of root dentin.
Jainaen A; Palamara JE; Messer HH
Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):e73-81. PubMed ID: 19616297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Scotti N; Scansetti M; Rota R; Pera F; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 20830497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth: effect of combination bleaching and an antioxidant.
Khoroushi M; Feiz A; Khodamoradi R
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 20945744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
