These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21621179)

  • 1. A demonstration of direct access to colored stimuli following cueing by color.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21621179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough.
    Kasten R; Navon D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
    Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidental learning of secondary attentional cueing.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):459-75. PubMed ID: 17927945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A facilitative effect of negative affective valence on working memory.
    Gotoh F; Kikuchi T; Olofsson U
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 20132459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition or facilitation of return: Does chromatic component count?
    do Canto-Pereira LH; Paramei GV; Morya E; Ranvaud RD
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):489-93. PubMed ID: 16961985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
    Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.
    Qian Q; Song M; Shinomori K; Wang F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 22718205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding.
    Talsma D; Mulckhuyse M; Slagter HA; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():92-105. PubMed ID: 17931607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Irons JL; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):758-75. PubMed ID: 22201470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the nature and time-course of the modality shift effect between vision and touch.
    Miles E; Brown R; Poliakoff E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):871-88. PubMed ID: 20931419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual flicker in the gamma-band range does not draw attention.
    van Diepen RM; Born S; Souto D; Gauch A; Kerzel D
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 103(3):1606-13. PubMed ID: 20089822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.